8 14

Cited 0 times in

Efficacy of Transforaminal Endoscopic Spine System (TESSYS) Technique in Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation

Authors
 Zhimin Pan  ;  Yoon Ha  ;  Seong Yi  ;  Kai Cao 
Citation
 MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, Vol.22 : 530-539, 2016-02 
Journal Title
 MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR 
ISSN
 1234-1010 
Issue Date
2016-02
MeSH
Adult ; C-Reactive Protein / metabolism ; Creatine Kinase / blood ; Diskectomy ; Endoscopy / methods* ; Female ; Foramen Magnum / surgery* ; Humans ; Interleukin-6 / blood ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement / blood ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement / diagnostic imaging ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement / surgery* ; Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) and traditional fenestration discectomy (FD) in treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 106 LDH patients were divided into TESSYS group (n=48) and FD group (n=58). Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), and modified MacNab criteria were used for efficacy evaluation. Post-operative responses were compared by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on detection of serum IL-6, CRP, and CPK levels. RESULTS In the TESSYS group, compared with the FD group, we observed, shorter incision length, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, lower hospitalization cost, shorter recovery time, lower complication rate (all P<0.001), and lower VAS scores of lumbago and skelalgia at 3 days and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (all P<0.05). At 24 and 48 h postoperatively, CRP level was remarkably higher in the FD group compared to the TESSYS group (P<0.001). Further, comparison of IL-6 levels at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively revealed significantly higher levels in the FD group than in the FESSYS group (all P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS TESSYS had clinical advantages over FD and entails less trauma and quicker postoperative recovery, suggesting that TESSYS is well tolerated by patients and is a better approach than FD in surgical treatment of LDH.
Files in This Item:
T201606776.pdf Download
DOI
10.12659/msm.894870
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurosurgery (신경외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Yi, Seong(이성)
Ha, Yoon(하윤)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/178507
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links