Background: Laboratory tests in blood banks vary with respect to methods,
equipment, and quality control according to the hospital’s environment.
Methods: We surveyed institutions that regularly participated in the Korean
association of external quality assessment using a web-based questionnaire
comprising 79 questions regarding transfusion laboratory work.
Results: A total of 84 institutions were surveyed including 17 senior general
hospitals, 43 general hospitals, 19 hospitals, four clinics, and one commercial
laboratory. ABO cell typing was performed by slide (63, 75.0%), tube (42,
50.0%), automated column (19, 22.6%), and automated microplate (7, 8.3%)
methods. ABO serum typing was performed by tube (75, 89.3%), automated
column (19, 22.6%), automated microplate (7, 8.3%), and slide (7, 8.3%)
methods. Irregular antibody screening test and identification test was
performed by 58 (69.0%) and 36 (42.9%) institutions, respectively. Irregular
antibody screening test and identification test was performed by the column
agglutination method in 34 (40.5%) and 26 (31.0%) institutions, respectively.
Room temperature saline, albumin, and anti-globulin reagent crossmatching
test (three-step method) was the most popular method (48, 57.1%). The
use of anti-globulin reagent in the crossmatching test did not significantly
vary according to the size of the hospital. A daily quality control program
for ABO, Rh typing, and the crossmatching test was conducted in 58 (69.0%)
institutions.
Conclusions: There were differences in transfusion-related laboratory tests
among the institutions. Although this survey included a limited number of
institutions, it can be helpful to evaluate the routine laboratory tests and
transfusion-related blood bank work in each institution.