0 193

Cited 0 times in

Significance of dynamic contour tonometry in evaluation of progression of glaucoma in patients with a history of laser refractive surgery

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author김찬윤-
dc.contributor.author배형원-
dc.contributor.author성공제-
dc.contributor.author이상엽-
dc.contributor.author최웅락-
dc.contributor.author배형원-
dc.contributor.author성공제-
dc.contributor.author이상엽-
dc.contributor.author최웅락-
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-13T16:49:42Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-13T16:49:42Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn0007-1161-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/175529-
dc.description.abstractAIMS: In this study, we tested the hypothesis that intraocular pressure (IOP) parameters measured by dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) would be more relevant in progression of glaucoma when there is a history of laser refractive surgery (LRS) than the IOP parameters measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) or calculated by correction formulae. METHODS: Ninety-eight eyes in 54 patients with open-angle glaucoma and a history of LRS were included in this retrospective study. IOP was measured by both GAT and DCT during follow-up. Baseline, mean, and peak IOP, IOP fluctuation, and IOP reduction were measured by each tonometry method. Corrected IOP parameters using central corneal thickness and mean keratometry values were also analysed. Clustered logistic regression was used to identify variables correlated with progression of glaucoma. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for correlated variables were also compared. RESULTS: The mean DCT value (OR 1.36, p=0.024), peak DCT value (OR 1.19, p=0.02) and pattern SD (OR 1.10, p=0.016) were significant risk factors for progression. There was a significant difference in the predictive ability of the mean DCT and GAT values (AUC 0.63 and 0.514, respectively; p=0.01) and of the peak DCT and GAT values (0.646 and 0.503, respectively, p=0.009). The AUCs for corrected IOP did not exceed those of DCT. CONCLUSIONS: IOP measurements were more associated with progression of glaucoma when measurements were obtained by DCT than by GAT or correction formulae in eyes with a history of LRS.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherBMJ Pub. Group-
dc.relation.isPartOfBRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleSignificance of dynamic contour tonometry in evaluation of progression of glaucoma in patients with a history of laser refractive surgery-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Yeop Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun Woo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWungrak Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChan Keum Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSangah Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyoung Won Bae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGong Je Seong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChan Yun Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313771-
dc.contributor.localIdA01035-
dc.contributor.localIdA01814-
dc.contributor.localIdA01814-
dc.contributor.localIdA01946-
dc.contributor.localIdA01946-
dc.contributor.localIdA02820-
dc.contributor.localIdA02820-
dc.contributor.localIdA04123-
dc.contributor.localIdA04123-
dc.contributor.localIdA01814-
dc.contributor.localIdA01814-
dc.contributor.localIdA01946-
dc.contributor.localIdA01946-
dc.contributor.localIdA02820-
dc.contributor.localIdA02820-
dc.contributor.localIdA04123-
dc.contributor.localIdA04123-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00412-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-2079-
dc.identifier.pmid31088795-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://bjo.bmj.com/content/104/2/276.long-
dc.subject.keyworddynamic contour tonometry-
dc.subject.keywordglaucoma progression-
dc.subject.keywordgoldmann applanation tonometry-
dc.subject.keywordintraocular pressure-
dc.subject.keywordlaser refractive surgery-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Chan Yun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김찬윤-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor배형원-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor배형원-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor성공제-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor성공제-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이상엽-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이상엽-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최웅락-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최웅락-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor배형원-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor배형원-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor성공제-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor성공제-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이상엽-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이상엽-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최웅락-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최웅락-
dc.citation.volume104-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage276-
dc.citation.endPage281-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, Vol.104(2) : 276-281, 2020-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.