9 14

Cited 0 times in

Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors
 Young Seok Seo  ;  Ji-Man Kang  ;  Dong Soo Kim  ;  Jong Gyun Ahn 
Citation
 BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, Vol.20(1) : 14, 2020 
Journal Title
 BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES 
Issue Date
2020
Keywords
Child ; Extrapulmonary tuberculosis ; Meta-analysis ; Xpert MTB/RIF
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Xpert® MTB/RIF assay (Xpert; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is a cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification assay for rapidly diagnosing tuberculosis and assessing antibiotic sensitivity. Although previous evidence supports the use of Xpert for diagnosing extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in adults, information regarding the accuracy of Xpert for EPTB only in children is lacking. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of Xpert for detecting EPTB in children. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register from January 1, 2010 to July 16, 2019 for studies of the diagnostic performance wherein Xpert was analyzed against cultures or composite reference standards for < 18-year-old children with EPTB. RESULTS: In only pediatric studies, 8 studies including 652 samples were selected. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert for all samples were 71% (95% CI 0.63-0.79) and 97% (95% CI 0.95-0.99), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve was 0.89. For lymph node tissues or aspirates, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert were 80% (95% CI 0.70-0.88) and 94% (95% CI 0.89-0.97), respectively; for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), these values were 42% (95% CI 0.22-0.63) and 99% (95% CI 0.95-1.00), respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall, Xpert displayed high specificity but modest sensitivity across various samples for diagnosing pediatric EPTB compared to the composite reference standard. Xpert sensitivity varied with the sampling site and was especially lower in CSF samples. Positive Xpert results may be considered to indicate a presumptive case of pediatric EPTB, whereas negative test results indicate that the possibility of pediatric EPTB should not be excluded.
Files in This Item:
T202000148.pdf Download
DOI
10.1186/s12879-019-4745-1
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Pediatrics (소아청소년과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kang, Ji-Man(강지만)
Kim, Dong Soo(김동수)
Ahn, Jong Gyun(안종균) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5748-0015
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/174918
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse