176 165

Cited 0 times in

체외순환적용시 비박동성 관류법과 박동성 관류법간의 혈류역학과 신장기능 비교 ?관상동맥우회술 환자를 대상으로?

Other Titles
 A Comparative Study of Nonpuisatile and Pulsatile Perfusion on Hemodynamics and Renal Function - Centered on the patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass 
 심연희  ;  이현화  ;  이춘수  ;  박준희  ;  홍용우  ;  곽영란 
 Journal of Korean Society of Anesthesiologist (대한마취과학회지), Vol.39(6) : 811-817, 2000 
Journal Title
Journal of Korean Society of Anesthesiologist(대한마취과학회지)
Issue Date
heart ; Cardiopulmonary bypass ; nonpulsatile perfusion ; pulsatile perfusion ; hemody-namics ; mean arterial pressure ; peripheral vascular resistance ; renal function
Background : It has been widely believed tbat pulsatile flow was better than nonpulsatile flow. However it remains uncertain whether pulsatile perfusion has shown substantive clinical improvement compared to standard, nonpulsatile perfusion. The porpose of this study was to compare nonpulsatile perfusion with pulsatile perfusion on hemodynamic and renal function during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in the patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods : Twenty patients undergoing CABG wete divided into two groups, nonpulsatile perfusion group (NP) and pulsatile perfusion group (PP). Hemodynsmic data was measured at preinduction, postin-duction, immediately after aorta cross clamping (ACC on), and 60 minutes after the start of CPB (CPB 60'). Hemodynamic variables included mean arterial pressme (MAP), peripheral vascular resistance (PVR), plasma catecholamine (epinephrine, norepinephrine), and dasage of the vasodilator (sodium nitroprusside). Renal parameters were urine output, and serum BUN and creatinine. They were measured at preCPB, during CPB, postCPB, and POD l. Results : MAP was significantly higher in NP at CPB 60'. At CPB 60, PVR returned to preinduction level in NP, but was still decreased in PP. The dosage of vaaodilator (sodium nitroprusside) infusion was significantly higher in NP than in PP. In both groups, plasma epinephrines were increased significantly during CPB but there was no difference between the groups. Plasma norepinephrine was significaotly bigher in NP than in PP during CPB. At postCPB, urine output was higher than preCPB anly in PP. At POD 1, serom BUN increased to the preCPB level in MP but was still decreased in PP. After CPB, serum creatinine was decreased significantly in PP. There was no significant difference in renal parameters between both groups. Conclusion: It was suggested that pulsatile perfusion, compared with nonpulsatile perfusion, can attenuate hemodynamic changes by decreasing release of plasma norepinephrine, peripheral vascular resistance, mean arterial pressure and dosage of vasodilator during cardiopulmonary bypass. Pulsatile perfusion didn't show substantive clinical diffece of renal outcome in patients without preoperative renal dysfunction. (Korean J Anesthesiol 2000; 39: 811-817)
Files in This Item:
T200002583.pdf Download
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kwak, Young Lan(곽영란) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2984-9927
Shim, Yon Hee(심연희) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1921-3391
사서에게 알리기


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.