112 158

Cited 16 times in

Reconstructive Surgery in Primary Malignant and Aggressive Benign Bone Tumor of the Proximal Humerus

Authors
 Kyoo-Ho Shin  ;  Hong Jun Park  ;  Je Hyun Yoo  ;  Soo Bong Hahn 
Citation
 Yonsei Medical Journal, Vol.41(3) : 304-311, 2000 
Journal Title
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL
ISSN
 0513-5796 
Issue Date
2000
MeSH
Adolescent ; Adult ; Arthroplasty/methods* ; Bone Cements ; Bone Nails ; Bone Neoplasms/pathology ; Bone Neoplasms/physiopathology ; Bone Neoplasms/surgery* ; Child ; Chondrosarcoma/surgery ; Female ; Giant Cell Tumors/surgery ; Humans ; Humerus/pathology ; Humerus/physiopathology ; Humerus/surgery* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteosarcoma/surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Malignant bone tumor ; proximal humerus ; reconstructive surgery
Abstract
Primary malignant bone tumors of the proximal humerus have traditionally been treated by forequarter amputation. However, with the increased interest in limb salvage operations, efforts have been made to improve reconstructive surgery and some methods have become available for tumor control and preservation of a useful distal limb. This report describes three reconstructive techniques used for reconstruction of the humerus following primary tumor excision. We followed 11 patients treated by reconstructive surgery following tumor excision for primary malignant and aggressive benign bone tumors in the proximal humerus. The average follow-up period was 35.6 months. The histologic diagnosis included osteosarcoma (9), chondrosarcoma (1) and giant cell tumor (1). The options for reconstructive surgery following tumor excision were six prosthetic arthroplasties with low heat treated autobone, four arthroplasties with Ender nail and bone cement, and one arthroplasty with custom-made tumor prosthesis. We performed a retrospective analysis regarding functional status, as well as local recurrence, distant metastasis and complication. The functional status at final follow-up averaged 16 points (53.3%) overall: 17 points (56.7%) in the six prosthetic arthroplasties with low heat treated autobone; 15 points (50.0%) in two of four arthroplasties with Ender nail and bone cement (the two others died); and 16 points (53.3%) in the one arthroplasty with custom-made tumor prosthesis. Local recurrence was not observed in any of the cases. The complications noted were one nonunion between reimplanted, low heat treated autobone and the normal distal humerus and two metal failures. Each of these techniques for reconstructive surgery resulted in a relatively good outcome, although somewhat better results were found in the case of prosthetic arthroplasty with low heat treated autobone.
Files in This Item:
T200003503.pdf Download
DOI
10.3349/ymj.2000.41.3.304
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Shin, Kyoo Ho(신규호)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/171935
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links