Cited 25 times in
Hardness of celluloid strip-finished or polished composite surfaces with time.
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 박성호 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-11T05:25:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-11T05:25:43Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2000 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-3913 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/171868 | - |
dc.description.abstract | STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: An in-vitro study revealed that a celluloid strip-finished composite surface discolored more than the polished composite surface. Thus, the celluloid strip-finished composite surface may not cure enough compared with the polished composite surface. PURPOSE: This study tested the hypothesis that the celluloid strip-finished composite surface did not cure enough compared with the polished composite surface. METHODS AND MATERIAL: The composite was placed in a 1.5-mm thick aluminum mold and the upper surface was covered with a celluloid strip. Composite was light cured for 60 seconds, then a layer of approximately 200 microm thick was ground away from the lower surface and polished. The hardness of the upper composite surface that was polymerized under a celluloid strip and the polished lower surface were measured with Vickers hardness measuring instrument 15 minutes, 6 hours, and 6 days after light curing. The hardnesses of polished and celluloid strip-finished surfaces were compared using a paired t test. One-way ANOVA and Tukey was used for tests for the significant differences in hardnesses between 15 minutes, 6 hours, and 6 days after light curing for a given surface. RESULTS: Microhardness of the celluloid strip-finished composite surface was 380.6 N/mm(2) at 15 minutes, 442.5 N/mm(2) at 6 hours, and 519.2 N/mm(2) at 6 days after light curing. Microhardnesses of the polished composite surface was 476.6 N/mm(2) at 15 minutes, 511.7 N/mm(2) at 6 hours, and 535.0 N/mm(2) at 6 days after light curing. The hardness of the celluloid strip-opposed composite surface was significantly lower than that of the polished surface 15 minutes and 6 hours after light curing (P <. 001). There was no difference in hardness between the celluloid strip-opposed surface and the polished surface on the sixth day. CONCLUSION: The hardness of the celluloid strip-opposed composite surface was lower than that of the polished surface at 15 minutes and at 6 hours after light curing. However, there was no difference in microhardness in 6 days. | - |
dc.description.statementOfResponsibility | restriction | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.publisher | Mosby-Year Book | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry | - |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Analysis of Variance | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Composite Resins* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Dental Polishing/instrumentation | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Dental Polishing/methods* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Dental Polishing/statistics & numerical data | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Hardness | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Hardness Tests/methods | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Light | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Surface Properties | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Time Factors | - |
dc.title | Hardness of celluloid strip-finished or polished composite surfaces with time. | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.college | College of Dentistry (치과대학) | - |
dc.contributor.department | Dept. of Conservative Dentistry (보존과학교실) | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Sung-Ho Park | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Ivo Krejci | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Felix Lutz | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70067-9 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A01514 | - |
dc.relation.journalcode | J01718 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1097-6841 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 10842135 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391300700679 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Park, Sung Ho | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 박성호 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 83 | - |
dc.citation.number | 6 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 660 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 663 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Vol.83(6) : 660-663, 2000 | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.