0 84

Cited 15 times in

Tissue urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor levels in breast cancer

Authors
 S J Gong  ;  S Y Rha  ;  H C Chung  ;  N C Yoo  ;  J K Roh  ;  W I Yang  ;  K S Lee  ;  J S Min  ;  B S Kim 
Citation
 International Journal of Molecular Medicine, Vol.6(3) : 301-305, 2000 
Journal Title
 International Journal of Molecular Medicine 
ISSN
 1107-3756 
Issue Date
2000
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Breast Neoplasms/metabolism* ; Breast Neoplasms/mortality ; Breast Neoplasms/pathology ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Plasminogen Activators/metabolism* ; Prognosis ; Receptors, Cell Surface/metabolism* ; Receptors, Urokinase Plasminogen Activator ; Survival Rate
Abstract
Cancer invasion is induced by several proteolytic enzyme systems associated with the destruction of basement membrane and extracellular matrix. Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) have been reported as prognostic factors in breast cancer patients and plasminogen activation is regulated by various factors such as uPAR and growth factors. Thus, we examined the tissue levels of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) in breast cancer patients. Tissue uPAR levels were measured by ELISA assay in 268 breast cancer patients. The median and mean values of tissue uPAR level in breast cancer were 3.5 ng/mg cytosol protein and 4.8+/-3.6 ng/mg cytosol protein, respectively. Tissue uPAR level was the highest in T1 stage, but there was no statistical significance between the T stages (p>0.05), nor in nodal stage, in the value of uPAR according to progression. And the value of uPAR expression was not associated with estrogen and progesterone receptor status, number of involved node and percent of node involvement. In TNM stage, tissue uPAR levels were higher in patients with stage I-II than in patients with stage III-IV (p=0.027). In univariate analysis, nodal factor (p=0.002) and TNM stage (p=0.0004) were significant. But, multivariate analysis showed that TNM stage was the only significant prognostic factor (p=0.0002). These results suggest that uPAR is mainly associated with initial tumor invasion and other factors might be involved in later stages of cancer progression.
Full Text
https://www.spandidos-publications.com/ijmm/6/3/301
DOI
10.3892/ijmm.6.3.301
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Pathology (병리학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Roh, Jae Kyung(노재경)
Rha, Sun Young(라선영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2512-4531
Yang, Woo Ick(양우익) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6084-5019
Chung, Hyun Cheol(정현철) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-9471
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/171662
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links