43 69

Cited 0 times in

Minimally Invasive Single-Site Cholecystectomy in Obese Patients: Laparoscopic vs. Robotic

Authors
 Kyu Min Lee  ;  Dae Hun Han  ;  Seoung Yoon Roh  ;  Ho Kyoung Hwang  ;  Woo Jung Lee  ;  Chang Moo Kang 
Citation
 Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Vol.22(3) : 101-105, 2019 
Journal Title
 Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 
ISSN
 2234-778X 
Issue Date
2019
Keywords
Obesity ; Cholecystectomy ; Laparoscopy ; Robotic surgical procedures
Abstract
Purpose : Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is treatment method for management of benign gallbladder diseases. Further attempts are made to operate single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the procedure remains technically difficult, especially in obese patient. Recently, a robotic surgical system for minimal invasive surgery was introduced to overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery. Methods : From April 2009 to August 2017, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with single-site, minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) cholecystectomy with high BMI (>25 kg/m2). We analyzed general characteristics and perioperative outcomes between the single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy group and the robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) group. Results : Operation time (57.56±11.10 vs 98.5±12.28 p<0.001) was significantly longer and postoperative pain score (3.61 vs 5.15 p=0.000) was significantly higher in the robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) group, but the actual dissection time (25.85±11.09 vs 25.79±13.35 p=0.978) was not significantly different between the two approaches. Iatrogenic gallbladder perforation, (13 vs 6 p=0.005), patients undergoing RSSC showed a significantly smaller amount than did those undergoing single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SFLC). Conclusion : It is difficult to say for certain that RSSC is clearly better than SFLC in obese patients. However, because of the technical convenience and efficiency of surgery with RSSC, RSSC can be practically worthwhile. Further study is mandatory.
Files in This Item:
T201903603.pdf Download
DOI
10.7602/jmis.2019.22.3.101
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kang, Chang Moo(강창무) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5382-4658
Rho, Seoung Yoon(노승윤) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1265-826X
Lee, Kyu Min(이규민)
Lee, Woo Jung(이우정) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9273-261X
Han, Dai Hoon(한대훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2787-7876
Hwang, Ho Kyoung(황호경) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4064-7776
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/171459
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse