412 479

Cited 22 times in

In Vitro Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김선일-
dc.contributor.author김의성-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-28T01:39:37Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-28T01:39:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/171286-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to assess the effect of three calcium silicate-based sealers (EndoSeal MTA, Nano-ceramic Sealer, and Wellroot ST) and two epoxy resin-based sealers (AH-Plus, AD Seal) on various aspects, such as cell viability, inflammatory response, and osteogenic potential, of human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSCs). AH-Plus showed the lowest cell viability on hPDLSCs in all time periods in fresh media. In set media, hPDLSCs showed no significant differences in cell viability among all the tested materials. Wellroot ST showed the highest level of cell adhesion and the morphology of attached cells. AH-plus presented a significantly higher expression of IL-6 and IL-8 than the other sealers. AD Seal and three calcium silicate sealers showed high expression of the mesenchymal stem cell markers. ALP mRNA expression showed a significant increase in time-dependent manner on all of three calcium silicate-based sealers, which do not seem to interfere with the differentiation of hPDLSCs into osteoblasts. Based on the results from this study, calcium silicate-based sealers appear to be more biocompatible and less cytotoxic than epoxy resin-based sealers. Meanwhile, further and long-term clinical follow-up studies are required.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.isPartOfMaterials-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleIn Vitro Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Dentistry (치과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Conservative Dentistry (보존과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJu Kyung Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSunil Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSukjoon Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyeon-Cheol Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEuiseong Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ma12152411-
dc.contributor.localIdA00556-
dc.contributor.localIdA00833-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02182-
dc.identifier.eissn1996-1944-
dc.identifier.pmid31362338-
dc.subject.keywordbiocompatibility-
dc.subject.keywordcalcium silicate-
dc.subject.keywordcell viability-
dc.subject.keywordepoxy resin-
dc.subject.keywordinflammatory response-
dc.subject.keywordroot canal sealer-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Sun Il-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김선일-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김의성-
dc.citation.volume12-
dc.citation.number15-
dc.citation.startPageE2411-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMaterials, Vol.12(15) : E2411, 2019-
dc.identifier.rimsid63951-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Conservative Dentistry (보존과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.