0 620

Cited 827 times in

Cited 946 times in

Brigatinib versus Crizotinib in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Authors
 Camidge, D. R.  ;  Kim, H. R.  ;  Ahn, M. -J.  ;  Yang, J. C. -H.  ;  Han, J. -Y.  ;  Lee, J. -S.  ;  Hochmair, M. J.  ;  Li, J. Y. -C.  ;  Chang, G. -C.  ;  Lee, K. H.  ;  Gridelli, C.  ;  Delmonte, A.  ;  Garcia Campelo, R.  ;  Kim, D. -W.  ;  Bearz, A.  ;  Griesinger, F.  ;  Morabito, A.  ;  Felip, E.  ;  Califano, R.  ;  Ghosh, S.  ;  Spira, A.  ;  Gettinger, S. N.  ;  Tiseo, M.  ;  Gupta, N.  ;  Haney, J.  ;  Kerstein, D.  ;  Popat, S. 
Citation
 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, Vol.379(21) : 2027-2039, 2018-11 
Journal Title
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
ISSN
 0028-4793 
Issue Date
2018-11
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, has robust efficacy in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is refractory to crizotinib. The efficacy of brigatinib, as compared with crizotinib, in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who have not previously received an ALK inhibitor is unclear. METHODS In an open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who had not previously received ALK inhibitors to receive brigatinib at a dose of 180 mg once daily (with a 7-day lead-in period at 90 mg) or crizotinib at a dose of 250 mg twice daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included the objective response rate and intracranial response. The first interim analysis was planned when approximately 50% of 198 expected events of disease progression or death had occurred. RESULTS A total of 275 patients underwent randomization; 137 were assigned to brigatinib and 138 to crizotinib. At the first interim analysis (99 events), the median followup was 11.0 months in the brigatinib group and 9.3 months in the crizotinib group. The rate of progression-free survival was higher with brigatinib than with crizotinib (estimated 12-month progression-free survival, 67% (95% confidence interval {CI}, 56 to 75) vs. 43% [95% CI, 32 to 53); hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.74); P<0.001 by the log-rank test). The confirmed objective response rate was 71% (95% CI, 62 to 78) with brigatinib and 60% (95% CI, 51 to 68) with crizotinib; the confirmed rate of intracranial response among patients with measurable lesions was 78% (95% CI, 52 to 94) and 29% (95% CI, 11 to 52), respectively. No new safety concerns were noted. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who had not previously received an ALK inhibitor, progression-free survival was significantly longer among patients who received brigatinib than among those who received crizotinib.
DOI
10.1056/NEJMoa1810171
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Hye Ryun(김혜련) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-9070
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/170865
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links