64 86

Cited 0 times in

Short-Term Outcomes of Intracorporeal Delta-Shaped Gastroduodenostomy Versus Extracorporeal Gastroduodenostomy after Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Authors
 You Na Kim  ;  Ji Yeong An  ;  Yoon Young Choi  ;  Min-Gew Choi  ;  Jun Ho Lee  ;  Tae Sung Sohn  ;  Jae Moon Bae  ;  Sung Kim 
Citation
 Journal of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (대한위암학회지), Vol.19(1) : 111-120, 2019 
Journal Title
 Journal of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (대한위암학회지) 
ISSN
 1598-1320 
Issue Date
2019
Keywords
Body mass index ; Extracorporeal gastroduodenostomy ; Gastric cancer ; Intracorporealgastroduodenostomy ; Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy ; Surgical injuries
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Billroth I anastomosis is one of the most common reconstruction methods after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Intracorporeal Billroth I (ICBI) anastomosis and extracorporeal Billroth I (ECBI) anastomosis are widely used in laparoscopic surgery. Here we compared ICBI and ECBI outcomes at a major gastric cancer center. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 2,284 gastric cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy between 2009 and 2017. We divided the subjects into ECBI (n=1,681) and ICBI (n=603) groups, compared the patients' clinical characteristics and surgical and short-term outcomes, and performed risk factor analyses of postoperative complication development. RESULTS: The ICBI group experienced shorter operation times, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stays than the ECBI group. There were no clinically significant intergroup differences in diet initiation. Changes in white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels were similar between groups. Grade II-IV surgical complication rates were 2.7% and 4.0% in the ECBI and ICBI groups, respectively, with no significant intergroup differences. Male sex and a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 were independent risk factors for surgical complication development. In the ECBI group, patients with a BMI ≥30 experienced a significantly higher surgical complication rate than those with a lower BMI, while no such difference was observed in the ICBI group. CONCLUSION: The surgical safety of ICBI was similar to that of ECBI. Although the chosen anastomotic technique was not a risk factor for surgical complications, ECBI was more vulnerable to surgical complications than ICBI in patients with a high BMI (≥30).
Files in This Item:
T201902006.pdf Download
DOI
10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e10
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Choi, Yoon Young(최윤영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-7851
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/170270
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse