0 12

Feedback to providers improves evidence-based implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and reduces shocks

Authors
 Marc T. Silver  ;  Laurence D. Sterns  ;  Jonathan P. Piccini  ;  Boyoung Joung  ;  Chi-Keong Ching  ;  Robert A. Pickett  ;  Rafael Rabinovich  ;  Shufeng Liu  ;  Brett J. Peterson  ;  Daniel R. Lexcen 
Citation
 Heart Rhythm, Vol.12(3) : 545-553, 2015 
Journal Title
 Heart Rhythm 
ISSN
 1547-5271 
Issue Date
2015
Keywords
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator ; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming ; Quality improvement ; Shock
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks are associated with increased anxiety, health care utilization, and potentially mortality. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the Shock-Less Study was to determine if providing feedback reports to physicians on their adherence to evidence-based shock reduction programming could improve their programming behavior and reduce shocks. METHODS: Shock-Less enrolled primary prevention (PP) and secondary prevention (SP) ICD patients between 2009 and 2012 at 118 study centers worldwide and followed patients longitudinally after their ICD implant. Center-specific therapy programming reports (TPRs) were delivered to each center 9 to 12 months after their first enrollment. The reports detailed adherence to evidence-based programming targets: number of intervals to detect ventricular fibrillation (VF NID), longest treatment interval (LTI), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) discriminators (Wavelet, PR Logic), SVT limit, Lead Integrity Alert (LIA), and antitachycardia pacing (ATP). Clinicians programmed ICDs at their discretion. The primary outcome measure was the change in utilization of evidence-based shock reduction programming before (phase I, n = 2694 patients) and after initiation of the TPR (phase II, n = 1438 patients). RESULTS: Patients implanted after feedback reports (phase II) were up to 20% more likely to have their ICDs programmed in line with evidence-based shock reduction programming (eg, VF NID in PP patients 30/40 in 33.5% vs 18.6%, P < .0001). Patients implanted in phase II had a lower risk of all-cause shock (adjusted hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.90, P = .003). CONCLUSION: Providing programming feedback reports improves adherence to evidence-based shock reduction programming and is associated with lower risk of ICD shocks.
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/165106
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527114012600
DOI
10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.11.002
Appears in Collections:
1. Journal Papers (연구논문) > 1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)
Yonsei Authors
정보영(Joung, Bo Young) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9036-7225
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse