0 76

Cited 1 times in

Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme and the i-gel in paralysed elderly patients

Authors
 Myoung H. Kim  ;  Jae H. Lee  ;  Yong S. Choi  ;  Sujung Park  ;  Seokyung Shin 
Citation
 European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Vol.35(8) : 598-604, 2018 
Journal Title
 European Journal of Anaesthesiology 
ISSN
 0265-0215 
Issue Date
2018
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The laryngeal mask airway supreme (LMA-S) and i-gel are both popular second-generation supraglottic airway devices that have been widely studied in surgical patients, but their differences in clinical performance in the elderly are not clear. OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy and safety of the LMA-S and i-gel in anaesthetised and paralysed elderly patients. DESIGN: A randomised study. SETTING: Single-centre trial, study period January 2014 from to October 2016. PATIENTS: One hundred and six elderly patients who underwent urological or orthopaedic surgery with an expected duration less than 2 h. INTERVENTION: Patients were allocated to either the LMA-S (n = 53) or i-gel (n = 53) group. All insertions were performed in a standardised manner according to the manufacturers' instructions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Our primary endpoint was the rate of successful insertion at the first attempt. The adequacy of positive pressure ventilation and airway sealing, fibreoptic laryngoscopy grades and stability of airway maintenance during anaesthesia were also assessed. RESULTS: Although the rate of successful insertion at the first attempt was similar between the two groups (94.3 vs. 82.7%, P = 0.072), more patients required device manipulation during insertion with the LMA-S than the i-gel (42.3 vs. 18.9%, P = 0.011). Good fibreoptic laryngoscopy grades were significantly more common with the i-gel than the LMA-S (79.3 vs. 55.8%, P = 0.042), and peak inspiratory pressures were lower in the i-gel group both immediately after insertion and at the end of surgery. Leak pressures were significantly higher in the i-gel group than the LMA-S group, both immediately after insertion and at the end of surgery (25.8 vs. 23.0, P = 0.036; and 28.1 vs. 23.7, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both the LMA-S and i-gel were used successfully and safely in elderly patients. However, the i-gel demonstrated better airway sealing than the LMA-S at insertion and during maintenance of anaesthesia.
Full Text
https://insights.ovid.com/pubmed?pmid=28857785
DOI
10.1097/EJA.0000000000000700
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
김명화(Kim, Myoung Hwa) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4723-9425
박수정(Park, Sujung)
신서경(Shin, Seokyung) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2641-0070
이재훈(Lee, Jae Hoon) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6679-2782
최용선(Choi, Yong Seon) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5348-864X
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/163257
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse