58 67

Cited 0 times in

Current Awareness and Use of the Strain Echocardiography in Routine Clinical Practices: Result of a Nationwide Survey in Korea

Authors
 Ju-Hee Lee  ;  Jae-Hyeong Park  ;  Seung Woo Park  ;  Woo-Shik Kim  ;  Il Suk Sohn  ;  Jung Yeon Chin  ;  Jung Sun Cho  ;  Ho-Joong Youn  ;  Hae Ok Jung  ;  Sun Hwa Lee  ;  Seong-Hwan Kim  ;  Wook-Jin Chung  ;  Chi Young Shim  ;  Jin-Won Jeong  ;  Eui-Young Choi  ;  Se-Joong Rim  ;  Jang-Young Kim  ;  Kye Hun Kim  ;  Joon-Han Shin  ;  Dae-Hee Kim  ;  Ung Jeon  ;  Jung Hyun Choi  ;  Yong-Jin Kim  ;  Seung Jae Joo  ;  Ki-Hong Kim  ;  Kyoung Im Cho  ;  Goo-Yeong Cho 
Citation
 Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, Vol.25(3) : 91-97, 2017 
Journal Title
 Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound 
ISSN
 1975-4612 
Issue Date
2017
Abstract
Background: Because conventional echocardiographic parameters have several limitations, strain echocardiography has often been introduced in clinical practice. However, there are also obstacles in using it in clinical practice. Therefore, we wanted to find the current status of awareness on using strain echocardiography in Korea. Methods: We conducted a nationwide survey to evaluate current use and awareness of strain echocardiography from the members of the Korean Society of Echocardiography. Results: We gathered total 321 questionnaires from 25 cardiology centers in Korea. All participants were able to perform or interpret echocardiographic examinations. All participating institutions performed strain echocardiography. Most of our study participants (97%) were aware of speckle tracking echocardiography and 185 (58%) performed it for clinical and research purposes. Two-dimensional strain echocardiography was the most commonly used modality and left ventricle (LV) was the most commonly used cardiac chamber (99%) for clinical purposes. Most of the participants (89%) did not think LV strain can replace LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in their clinical practice. The common reasons for not performing routine use of strain echocardiography was diversity of strain measurements and lack of normal reference value. Many participants had a favorable view of the future of strain echocardiography. Conclusion: Most of our study participants were aware of strain echocardiography, and all institutions performed strain echocardiography for clinical and research purposes. However, they did not think the LV strain values could replace LVEF. The diversity of strain measurements and lack of normal reference values were common reasons for not using strain echocardiography in clinical practice.
Files in This Item:
T201703895.pdf Download
DOI
10.4250/jcu.2017.25.3.91
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Shim, Chi Young(심지영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-0136
Rim, Se Joong(임세중) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7631-5581
Choi, Eui Young(최의영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3732-0190
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/161402
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse