13 12

Cited 0 times in

Estimating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure by Echocardiography

Authors
 Oyvind S. Andersen  ;  Otto A. Smiseth  ;  Hisham Dokainish  ;  Muaz M. Abudiab  ;  Robert C. Schutt  ;  Arnav Kumar  ;  Kimi Sato  ;  Serge Harb  ;  Einar Gude  ;  Espen W. Remme  ;  Arne K. Andreassen  ;  Jong-Won Ha  ;  Jiaqiong Xu  ;  Allan L. Klein  ;  Sherif F. Nagueh 
Citation
 Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol.69(15) : 1937-1948, 2017 
Journal Title
 Journal of the American College of Cardiology 
ISSN
 0735-1097 
Issue Date
2017
MeSH
Aged ; Cardiac Catheterization/methods* ; Dimensional Measurement Accuracy ; Echocardiography, Doppler/methods* ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Heart Failure*/diagnosis ; Heart Failure*/etiology ; Heart Failure*/physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left*/complications ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left*/diagnosis ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left*/physiopathology ; Ventricular Pressure*
Keywords
Doppler ; catheterization ; diastole ; heart failure ; net reclassification improvement
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of heart failure may be challenging because symptoms are rather nonspecific. Elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure may be used to confirm the diagnosis, but cardiac catheterization is often not practical. Echocardiographic indexes are therefore used as markers of filling pressure. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the feasibility and accuracy of comprehensive echocardiography in identifying patients with elevated LV filling pressure. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter study of 450 patients with a wide spectrum of cardiac diseases referred for cardiac catheterization. Left atrial volume index, in combination with flow velocities and tissue Doppler velocities, was used to estimate LV filling pressure. Invasively measured pressure was used as the gold standard. RESULTS: Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 47%, with 209 patients having an LVEF <50%. Invasive measurements showed elevated LV filling pressure in 58% of patients. Clinical assessment had an accuracy of 72% in identifying patients with elevated filling pressure, whereas echocardiography had an accuracy of 87% (p < 0.001 vs. clinical assessment). The combination of clinical and echocardiographic assessment was incremental, with a net reclassification improvement of 1.5 versus clinical assessment (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic assessment of LV filling pressure is feasible and accurate. When combined with clinical data, it leads to a more accurate diagnosis, regardless of LVEF.
URI
http://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/161167
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.058
Appears in Collections:
1. Journal Papers (연구논문) > 1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)
Yonsei Authors
하종원(Ha, Jong Won)
사서에게 알리기
  feedback
Files in This Item:
T201704229.pdf Download
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse