4 631

Cited 71 times in

An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polymeric Micelle-Formulated Paclitaxel Compared to Conventional Cremophor EL-Based Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

Authors
 In Hae Park  ;  Joo Hyuk Sohn  ;  Sung Bae Kim  ;  Keun Seok Lee  ;  Joo Seop Chung  ;  Soo Hyeon Lee  ;  Tae You Kim  ;  Kyung Hae Jung  ;  Eun Kyung Cho  ;  Yang Soo Kim  ;  Hong Suk Song  ;  Jae Hong Seo  ;  Hun Mo Ryoo  ;  Sun Ah Lee  ;  So Young Yoon  ;  Chul Soo Kim  ;  Yong Tai Kim  ;  Si Young Kim  ;  Mi Ryung Jin  ;  Jungsil Ro 
Citation
 CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, Vol.49(3) : 569-577, 2017 
Journal Title
CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
ISSN
 1598-2998 
Issue Date
2017
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Biomarkers, Tumor ; Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Breast Neoplasms/metabolism ; Breast Neoplasms/mortality ; Breast Neoplasms/pathology ; Female ; Glycerol/administration & dosage ; Glycerol/adverse effects ; Glycerol/analogs & derivatives* ; Humans ; Micelles* ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Paclitaxel/administration & dosage* ; Paclitaxel/adverse effects ; Polymers* ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Receptor, ErbB-2 ; Recurrence ; Retreatment ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Cremophor EL-free ; Genexol-PM ; Metastatic breast cancer ; Polymeric micelle paclitaxel
Abstract
PURPOSE: Genexol-PM is a Cremophor EL-free formulation of low-molecular-weight, non-toxic, and biodegradable polymeric micelle-bound paclitaxel. We conducted a phase III study comparing the clinical efficacy and toxicity of Genexol-PM with conventional paclitaxel (Genexol).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Genexol-PM 260 mg/m2 or Genexol 175 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS: The study enrolled 212 patients, of whom 105 were allocated to receive Genexol-PM. The mean received dose intensity of Genexol-PM was 246.8±21.3 mg/m2 (95.0%), and that of Genexol was 168.3±10.6 mg/m2 (96.2%). After a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range, 0.0 to 48.7 months), the ORR of Genexol-PM was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.2 to 46.9) and the ORR of Genexol was 24.3% (95% CI, 17.5 to 31.1) (pnon-inferiority=0.021, psuperiority=0.016). The two groups did not differ significantly in overall survival (28.8 months for Genexol-PM vs. 23.8 months for Genexol; p=0.52) or progression-free survival (8.0 months for Genexol-PM vs. 6.7 months for Genexol; p=0.26). In both groups, the most common toxicities were neutropenia, with 68.6% occurrence in the Genexol-PM group versus 40.2% in the Genexol group (p < 0.01). The incidences of peripheral neuropathy of greater than grade 2 did not differ significantly between study treatments.

CONCLUSION: Compared with standard paclitaxel, Genexol-PM demonstrated non-inferior and even superior clinical efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Files in This Item:
T201703549.pdf Download
DOI
10.4143/crt.2016.289
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Sohn, Joo Hyuk(손주혁) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2303-2764
Lee, Soo Hyeon(이수현)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/160898
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links