0 105

Cited 7 times in

Systematic review and meta-analysis of initial management of pneumothorax in adults: Intercostal tube drainage versus other invasive methods

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author김민정-
dc.contributor.author박인철-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-20T07:40:41Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-20T07:40:41Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/160410-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The ideal invasive management as initial approach for pneumothorax (PTX) is still under debate. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the evidence for the effectiveness of intercostal tube drainage and other various invasive methods as the initial approach to all subtypes of PTX in adults. METHODS: Three databases were searched from inception to May 29, 2016: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL. Randomised controlled trials that evaluated intercostal tube drainage as the control and various invasive methods as the intervention for the initial approach to PTX in adults were included. The primary outcome was the early success rate of each method, and the risk ratios (RRs) were used for an effect size measure. The secondary outcomes were recurrence rate, hospitalization rate, hospital stay, and complications. RESULTS: Seven studies met our inclusion criteria. Interventions were aspiration in six studies and catheterization connected to a one-way valve in one study. Meta-analyses were conducted for early success rate, recurrence rate, hospitalization rate, and hospital stay. Aspiration was inferior to intercostal tube drainage in terms of early success rate (RR = 0.82, confidence interval [CI] = 0.72 to 0.95, I2 = 0%). While aspiration and intercostal tube drainage showed no significant difference in the recurrence rate (RR = 0.84, CI = 0.57 to 1.23, I2 = 0%), aspiration had shorter hospital stay than intercostal tube drainage (mean difference = -1.73, CI = -2.33 to -1.13, I2 = 0%). Aspiration had lower hospitalization rate than intercostal tube drainage, but marked heterogeneity was present (RR = 0.38, CI = 0.19 to 0.76, I2 = 85%). CONCLUSION: Aspiration was inferior to intercostal tube drainage in terms of early resolution, but it had shorter hospital stay. The recurrence rate of aspiration and intercostal tube drainage did not differ significantly. The efficacy of catheterization connected to a one-way valve was inconclusive because of the small number of relevant studies. (Registration of study protocol: PROSPERO, CRD42016037866).-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science-
dc.relation.isPartOfPLOS ONE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHDrainage/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHDrainage/methods-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLength of Stay-
dc.subject.MESHPneumothorax/therapy-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleSystematic review and meta-analysis of initial management of pneumothorax in adults: Intercostal tube drainage versus other invasive methods-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Emergency Medicine-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMin Joung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIncheol Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoon Min Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyung Hwan Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJunseok Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong Wun Shin-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0178802-
dc.contributor.localIdA00470-
dc.contributor.localIdA01628-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02540-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.pmid28640890-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Min Joung-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, In Cheol-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Min Joung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, In Cheol-
dc.citation.volume12-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.startPagee0178802-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPLOS ONE, Vol.12(6) : e0178802, 2017-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Emergency Medicine (응급의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.