206 471

Cited 0 times in

수술 전 항암방사선 치료를 시행한 직장암 환자에서 3차원 경항문 직장초음파의 초기 경험: 2차원 경항문 직장초음파, 컴퓨터 단층촬영 및 자기공명 영상과의 영상진단 정확도 비교.

Other Titles
 Early experience of three dimensional transrectal ultrasonography: comparison of diagnostic accuracy between two dimensional transrectal ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients with preoperative chemoradiation therapy. 
Authors
 류제규  ;  김영완  ;  김남규  ;  허혁  ;  민병소  ;  이강영  ;  손승국 
Citation
 Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology (대한임상종양학회지), Vol.6(2) : 43-51, 2010 
Journal Title
Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology(대한임상종양학회지)
ISSN
 1738-8082 
Issue Date
2010
Keywords
Three dimensional TRUS ; Rectal cancer ; Preoperative staging
Abstract
Purpose : This study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of three dimensional transrectal ultrasonography (3D TRUS) when compared to those of two dimensional transrectal ultrasonography, CT and MRI for preoperative chemoradiated rectal cancer.

Material and methods : Ninety-nine rectal cancer patients were enrolled. Among them, 58 patients were staged by 2D TRUS, CT and MRI and 41 patients were staged by 3D TRUS, CT and MRI. Depth of tumor invasion (T) and nodal involvement (N) assessed by imaging modalities were compared with pathologic results.

Results : When assessing depth of invasion, the accuracy of 2D and 3D TRUS,CT and MRI was 68.9%, 76%,68.6%, and 84.3%, respectively. Overstaging rates were 24.1%, 20%, 21.6%, and 9.6%, and understaging rates were 6.8%, 4%, 9.6% and 6%, respectively. In patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation, accuracy of depth of invasion was 57.1%, 66.6%, 56.3%, and 62.5%, and overstaging rates were 28.5%,33.3%,43.7%, and 37.5%, and understaging rates were 14.2%,0%,0%, and 0%, respectively. When assessing nodal involvement, accuracy of 2D and 3D TRUS, CT and MRI was 58.62%, 64%, 67.47%, and 73.49%, respectively. In patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation, accuracy of nodal involvement was 57.1%, 55.5%, 68.75%, and 68.7%, respectively.

Conclusion : Although early experience, overall diagnostic accuracy of 3D TRUS was superior to conventional 2D TRUS. As accumulation of experiences, 3D TRUS as well as MRI could be used as a useful tool for preoperative imaging for rectal cancer.
Files in This Item:
T201006222.pdf Download
DOI
10.14216/kjco.10018
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Nam Kyu(김남규) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0639-5632
Ryu, Je Gyu(류제규)
Min, Byung Soh(민병소) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0180-8565
Lee, Kang Young(이강영)
Hur, Hyuk(허혁) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9864-7229
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/158125
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links