0 163

Cited 9 times in

Intraindividual comparison of psychophysical parameters between perimodiolar and lateral-type electrode arrays in patients with bilateral cochlear implants

Authors
 Junhui Jeong  ;  Minbum Kim  ;  Ji Hye Heo  ;  Mi-Young Bang  ;  Mi Ran Bae  ;  Jungmin Kim  ;  Jae Young Choi 
Citation
 OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, Vol.36(2) : 228-234, 2015 
Journal Title
 OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY 
ISSN
 1531-7129 
Issue Date
2015
MeSH
Acoustic Stimulation ; Action Potentials/physiology* ; Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cochlear Implantation* ; Cochlear Implants* ; Evoked Potentials/physiology* ; Female ; Hearing/physiology* ; Hearing Loss/physiopathology ; Hearing Loss/surgery* ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Cochlea ; Cochlear implantation ; Electrode array ; Hearing
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Perimodiolar electrode arrays were developed to improve stimulation of specific neuronal populations and to decrease power consumption; however, they can damage the cochlear structure. We examined and compared psychophysical parameters of perimodiolar and lateral-type electrode arrays in patients who received a different type of bilateral cochlear implant (CI) in each ear. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Eight child patients (three males, five females) received a different CI in each ear (perimodiolar array and lateral array). They received the CIs sequentially (n = 7) or simultaneously (n = 1). INTERVENTIONS: Diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Electrically evoked compound action potential, threshold level, comfort level, and dynamic range (DR) of the basal, mid, and apical electrodes were compared. We also surveyed battery consumption for each device. RESULTS: Electrically evoked compound action potential threshold, threshold level, and comfort level were lower for the perimodiolar-type electrode array than for the lateral-type electrode array in most patients. However, the DR for the perimodiolar array was narrower than for the lateral array. For most patients, there was little difference in battery life. CONCLUSION: Although the level of electrical energy required for auditory stimulation seems to be lower for the perimodiolar electrode array than for the laterally placed array, the DR was wider and the amount of battery consumption was similar. The electrode array should be chosen by considering various patient factors, such as residual hearing.
Full Text
http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00129492-201502000-00008&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
DOI
10.1097/MAO.0000000000000672
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology (이비인후과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Bang, Mi Young(방미영)
Bae, Mi Ran(배미란)
Choi, Jae Young(최재영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9493-3458
Heo, Ji Hye(허지혜)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/157220
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse