197 466

Cited 6 times in

Assessment of a panel of tumor markers for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant effusions by well-based reverse phase protein array

Authors
 Till Braunschweig  ;  Joon-Yong Chung  ;  Chel Hun Choi  ;  Hanbyoul Cho  ;  Qing-Rong Chen  ;  Ran Xie  ;  Candice Perry  ;  Javed Khan  ;  Stephen M Hewitt 
Citation
 DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, Vol.10 : 53, 2015 
Journal Title
DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY
Issue Date
2015
MeSH
Area Under Curve ; Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis* ; Cluster Analysis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Pleural Effusion/diagnosis* ; Pleural Effusion/etiology ; Pleural Effusion/metabolism* ; Pleural Effusion, Malignant/chemistry* ; Pleural Effusion, Malignant/diagnosis* ; Pleural Effusion, Malignant/etiology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Protein Array Analysis* ; ROC Curve
Keywords
Cytodiagnosis ; Tumor biomarkers ; Neoplasms ; Mucin 1 ; Epithelial membrane antigen ; Pleural effusion
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The differential diagnosis of benign and malignant effusion is often hampered by low cell content or insufficiently preserved tumor cells. In this study, we evaluated the combined diagnostic value of six tumor markers measured by well-based reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) for diagnosis of malignant effusion.

METHODS: A total of 114 patients (46 with malignant effusions, 32 with probable malignant effusions, and 36 with benign effusions) were enrolled. Expressional levels of MUC1, EMA, Pan-CK, HSP90, TGF-β and CA125 were determined by well-based RPPA.

RESULTS: Median relative expression of MUC1, Pan-CK and EMA were significantly higher in malignant effusion than those in probable malignant or benign (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, p < 0.001, respectively), whereas the level of TGF-β in malignant effusions were significantly lower than that in the other groups (p = 0.005). For predicting malignancy, EMA presented the best areas under the curve of 0.728 followed by MUC1 of 0.701. The sensitivity of 52.0% for MUC1 and 48.0% for EMA were not better than cytology. However, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the tumor marker panel were better than cytology by 14.7%, 7.5%, and 6.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Tumor marker panel measured by well-based RPPA showed values in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant effusions. Further large scale studies need to be performed to evaluate the utility of this panel of markers.

VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1433424467160224.
Files in This Item:
T201504990.pdf Download
DOI
10.1186/s13000-015-0290-4
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Cho, Hanbyoul(조한별) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6177-1648
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/156974
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links