72 96

Cited 4 times in

Comparison of Diagnostic Algorithms for Detecting Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Routine Practice at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Korea

Authors
 Hee-Won Moon  ;  Hyeong Nyeon Kim  ;  Mina Hur  ;  Hee Sook Shim  ;  Heejung Kim  ;  Yeo-Min Yun 
Citation
 PLOS ONE, Vol.11(8) : e0161139, 2016 
Journal Title
 PLOS ONE 
Issue Date
2016
MeSH
Adult ; Algorithms ; Bacterial Proteins/analysis* ; Bacterial Toxins/analysis* ; Bacteriological Techniques ; Child ; Clostridium difficile/isolation & purification* ; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/diagnosis* ; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/microbiology ; Enterotoxins/analysis* ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Female ; Glutamate Dehydrogenase/analysis* ; Humans ; Male ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Republic of Korea ; Tertiary Care Centers
Abstract
Since every single test has some limitations for detecting toxigenic Clostridium difficile, multistep algorithms are recommended. This study aimed to compare the current, representative diagnostic algorithms for detecting toxigenic C. difficile, using VIDAS C. difficile toxin A&B (toxin ELFA), VIDAS C. difficile GDH (GDH ELFA, bioM?rieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France), and Xpert C. difficile (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California, USA). In 271 consecutive stool samples, toxigenic culture, toxin ELFA, GDH ELFA, and Xpert C. difficile were performed. We simulated two algorithms: screening by GDH ELFA and confirmation by Xpert C. difficile (GDH + Xpert) and combined algorithm of GDH ELFA, toxin ELFA, and Xpert C. difficile (GDH + Toxin + Xpert). The performance of each assay and algorithm was assessed. The agreement of Xpert C. difficile and two algorithms (GDH + Xpert and GDH+ Toxin + Xpert) with toxigenic culture were strong (Kappa, 0.848, 0.857, and 0.868, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of algorithms (GDH + Xpert and GDH + Toxin + Xpert) were 96.7%, 95.8%, 85.0%, 98.1%, and 94.5%, 95.8%, 82.3%, 98.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences between Xpert C. difficile and two algorithms in sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV. The performances of both algorithms for detecting toxigenic C. difficile were comparable to that of Xpert C. difficile. Either algorithm would be useful in clinical laboratories and can be optimized in the diagnostic workflow of C. difficile depending on costs, test volume, and clinical needs.
Files in This Item:
T201603002.pdf Download
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0161139
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Laboratory Medicine (진단검사의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Heejung(김희정) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0190-703X
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/151853
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse