149 442

Cited 43 times in

Radioembolization Is a Safe and Effective Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Propensity Score Analysis

Authors
 Young Youn Cho  ;  Minjong Lee  ;  Hyo-Cheol Kim  ;  Jin Wook Chung  ;  Yun Hwan Kim  ;  Geum-Youn Gwak  ;  Si Hyun Bae  ;  Do Young Kim  ;  Jeong Heo  ;  Yoon Jun Kim 
Citation
 PLOS ONE, Vol.11(5) : e0154986, 2016 
Journal Title
PLOS ONE
Issue Date
2016
MeSH
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy* ; Embolization, Therapeutic/methods ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms/therapy* ; Male ; Microspheres ; Middle Aged ; Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives ; Niacinamide/therapeutic use ; Phenylurea Compounds/therapeutic use ; Portal Vein/drug effects* ; Propensity Score ; Radiopharmaceuticals/administration & dosage* ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy* ; Yttrium Radioisotopes/administration & dosage*
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Limited treatment options are available for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Transarterial radioembolization using Yttrium-90 microspheres is a new treatment modality for HCC with PVT. For this analysis, we compared responses to treatment with radioembolization and with sorafenib.

METHODS: We evaluated 32 patients who were part of a multicenter retrospective cohort. All patients had PVT without extrahepatic metastasis and were treated with radioembolization in one of six tertiary referral hospitals in Korea. We retrospectively enrolled another 31 consecutive PVT patients without extrahepatic metastasis from a single center who received sorafenib treatment to serve as the control group. We used inverse probability weighting (IPW) using propensity scores to adjust for the between-group differences in baseline characteristics.

RESULTS: At 3 months, the response rate and disease control rate were 32.1% (9/32) and 57.1% (16/32), respectively, in the radioembolization group and 3.2% (1/31) and 41.9% (13/31) in the sorafenib group. Median overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were not significantly different between the radioembolization group and the sorafenib group (13.8 months and 10.0 months, P = 0.22; and 6.0 months and 6.0 months, P = 0.08; respectively). No differences in OS (P = 0.97) or TTP (P = 0.34) were observed after IPW was applied to balance the population characteristics. The sorafenib group showed significantly more grade 3/4 adverse effects than the radioembolization group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: HCC patients with PVT who underwent radioembolization achieved comparable survival to patients who received sorafenib, even after application of IPW. The radioembolization group also experienced fewer severe adverse effects. Radioembolization can be considered a new treatment option for patients with HCC with PVT.
Files in This Item:
T201602987.pdf Download
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0154986
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Do Young(김도영)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/151843
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links