Validation Study of the Korean Version of the Brief Fatigue Inventory
Authors
Young Ho Yun ; Xin Shelley Wang ; Jung Suk Lee ; Ju Won Roh ; Chang Geol Lee ; Won Sup Lee ; Keun Seok Lee ; Soo-Mee Bang ; Tito R. Mendoza ; Charles S. Cleeland
Citation
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, Vol.29(2) : 165-172, 2005
Comorbidity ; Data Collection/standards* ; Europe/epidemiology ; Fatigue/diagnosis* ; Fatigue/epidemiology* ; Female ; Humans ; Korea/epidemiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms/epidemiology* ; Quality of Life ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment/methods* ; Risk Factors ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Severity of Illness Index* ; Sickness Impact Profile*
Keywords
Cancer ; fatigue ; assessment ; validation ; Korea
Abstract
The goal of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI-K). One hundred seventy-eight cancer patients and the same number of age- and sex-matched control subjects completed the BFI-K, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and a Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the BFI-K was 0.956 in the cancer patient group and 0.955 in the control group. The global score and nine of the single item scores for the BFI-K were significantly correlated with the fatigue and global health status/QoL subscale of the EORTC QLQ-C30, BDI, and BPI (coefficient range 0.38–0.66). Discriminant validity showed that BFI-K could distinguish significant differences of performance status between subgroups of patients, and between the cancer patient group and the control group, as expected. Our study has shown that the BFI-K is a reliable, valid self-rating instrument in terms of its psychometric properties.