431 646

Cited 8 times in

Development of a Screening Tool for Predicting Adverse Outcomes of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author권자영-
dc.contributor.author김덕원-
dc.contributor.author김영한-
dc.contributor.author박용원-
dc.contributor.author박지수-
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-24T03:06:59Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-24T03:06:59Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn0025-7974-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/146246-
dc.description.abstractGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common disease in pregnancy causing maternal and fetal complications. To prevent these adverse outcomes, optimal screening and diagnostic criteria must be adequate, timely, and efficient. This study suggests a novel approach that is practical, efficient, and patient- and clinician-friendly in predicting adverse outcomes of GDM. The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study via medical record review of patients admitted between March 2001 and April 2013 at the Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. Patients diagnosed by a conventional 2-step method were evaluated according to the presence of adverse outcomes (neonatal hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and hyperinsulinemia; admission to the neonatal intensive care unit; large for gestational age; gestational insulin therapy; and gestational hypertension). Of 802 women who had an abnormal 50-g, 1-hour glucose challenge test, 306 were diagnosed with GDM and 496 did not have GDM (false-positive group). In the GDM group, 218 women (71.2%) had adverse outcomes. In contrast, 240 women (48.4%) in the false-positive group had adverse outcomes. Women with adverse outcomes had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) at entry (P = 0.03) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) (P = 0.03). Our logistic regression model derived from 2 variables, BMI at entry and FBG, predicted GDM adverse outcome with an area under the curve of 0.642, accuracy of 61.3%, sensitivity of 57.2%, and specificity of 66.9% compared with the conventional 2-step method with an area under the curve of 0.610, accuracy of 59.1%, sensitivity of 47.6%, and specificity of 74.4%. Our model performed better in predicting GDM adverse outcomes than the conventional 2-step method using only BMI at entry and FBG. Moreover, our model represents a practical, inexpensive, efficient, reproducible, easy, and patient- and clinician-friendly approach.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.relation.isPartOfMEDICINE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Glucose-
dc.subject.MESHBody Mass Index-
dc.subject.MESHDiabetes, Gestational/epidemiology*-
dc.subject.MESHFalse Positive Reactions-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHGlucose Tolerance Test-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHInfant, Newborn-
dc.subject.MESHInfant, Newborn, Diseases/epidemiology*-
dc.subject.MESHMass Screening/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHPredictive Value of Tests-
dc.subject.MESHPregnancy-
dc.subject.MESHRepublic of Korea-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Factors-
dc.titleDevelopment of a Screening Tool for Predicting Adverse Outcomes of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.locationUnited States-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Obstetrics & Gynecology-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJee Soo Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDeok Won Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJa-Young Kwon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYong Won Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Han Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHee Young Cho-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MD.0000000000002204-
dc.contributor.localIdA00246-
dc.contributor.localIdA00376-
dc.contributor.localIdA00730-
dc.contributor.localIdA01581-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02214-
dc.identifier.eissn1536-5964-
dc.identifier.pmid26735528-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKwon, Ja Young-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Deok Won-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Young Han-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Yong Won-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKwon, Ja Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Deok Won-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Young Han-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Yong Won-
dc.citation.volume95-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage2204-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMEDICINE, Vol.95(1) : 2204, 2016-
dc.date.modified2017-02-24-
dc.identifier.rimsid51263-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Medical Engineering (의학공학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.