154 300

Cited 26 times in

Comparison between Posterolateral Fusion with Pedicle Screw Fixation and Anterior Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Fixation in Adult Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis

Authors
 Kyung Soo Suk  ;  Chang Hoon Jeon  ;  Moon Soo Park  ;  Seong Hwan Moon  ;  Nam Hyun Kim  ;  Hwan Mo Lee 
Citation
 YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, Vol.42(3) : 316-323, 2001 
Journal Title
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL
ISSN
 0513-5796 
Issue Date
2001
MeSH
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Bone Screws* ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Radiography ; Spinal Fusion/methods* ; Spondylolisthesis/diagnostic imaging ; Spondylolisthesis/surgery*
Keywords
amterior interbody fusion ; lumbar spine ; pedicle screw fixation ; posterolateal fusion ; spondylolytic spondy-lolisthesis
Abstract
There have been many reports regarding various operative methods for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. However, there have been no reports regarding the comparison between posterolateral fusion (PLF) with pedicle screw fixation (PSF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with PSF. The purpose of the current study was to compare the clinical outcomes of PLF with PSF and ALIF with PSF, and to help in the selection of treatment options. Fifty-six patients with spondylolytic spondylolisthesis who underwent PLF with PSF (group 1, 35 patients) or who underwent ALIF with PSF (group 2, 21 patients) were studied. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Demographic variables and disease state were similar for the two groups. We studied operating time, amount of blood loss, duration of hospital stay, clinical outcomes, complications, time at which fusion was complete, fusion rate, and radiological measurements. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the amount of blood loss, duration of hospital stay, back pain, radiating pain, fusion rate, or complication rate. However, in group 2, the operation time and the time at which fusion became complete was longer, and in group 1 there was significant radiological reduction loss. In conclusion, PLF with PSF was just as effective as ALIF with PSF in terms of clinical outcomes, but ALIF with PSF was superior to PLF with PSF in terms of the prevention of reduction loss. Anterior support would be helpful for preventing reduction loss in cases of spondylolytic spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine.
Files in This Item:
T200101626.pdf Download
DOI
10.3349/ymj.2001.42.3.316
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Moon, Seong Hwan(문성환)
Lee, Hwan Mo(이환모) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5405-3832
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/142122
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links