92 137

Cited 0 times in

Conventional versus Analgesia-Oriented Combination Sedation on Recovery Profiles and Satisfaction after ERCP: A Randomized Trial

 Seokyung Shin  ;  Tak Geun Oh  ;  Moon Jae Chung  ;  Jeong Youp Park  ;  Seung Woo Park  ;  Jae Bok Chung  ;  Si Young Song  ;  Jooyoun Cho  ;  Sang-Hun Park  ;  Young Chul Yoo  ;  Seungmin Bang 
 PLoS One, Vol.10(9) : e0138422, 2015 
Journal Title
 PLoS One 
Issue Date
BACKGROUND: The importance of providing effective analgesia during sedation for complex endoscopic procedures has been widely recognized. However, repeated administration of opioids in order to achieve sufficient analgesia may carry the risk of delayed recovery after propofol based sedation. This study was done to compare recovery profiles and the satisfaction of the endoscopists and patients between conventional balanced propofol sedation and analgesia-oriented combination sedation for patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: Two hundred and two adult patients scheduled for ERCP were sedated by either the Conventional (initial bolus of meperidine with propofol infusion) or Combination (repeated bolus doses of fentanyl with propofol infusion) method. Recovery profiles, satisfaction levels of the endoscopists and patients, drug requirements and complications were compared between groups. RESULTS: Patients of the Combination Group required significantly less propofol compared to the Conventional Group (135.0 ± 68.8 mg vs. 165.3 ± 81.7 mg, P = 0.005). Modified Aldrete scores were not different between groups throughout the recovery period, and recovery times were also comparable between groups. Satisfaction scores were not different between the two groups in both the endoscopists and patients (P = 0.868 and 0.890, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the significant reduction in propofol dose, the non-inferiority of recovery profiles and satisfaction scores of the endoscopists and patients, analgesia oriented combination sedation may be a more safe yet effective sedative method compared to conventional balanced propofol sedation during ERCP.
Appears in Collections:
1. Journal Papers (연구논문) > 1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실)
1. Journal Papers (연구논문) > 1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)
Yonsei Authors
박승우(Park, Seung Woo) ; 박정엽(Park, Jeong Youp) ; 방승민(Bang, Seungmin) ; 송시영(Song, Si Young) ; 신서경(Shin, Seokyung) ; 오탁근(Oh, Tak Geun) ; 유영철(Yoo, Young Chul) ; 정문재(Chung, Moon Jae) ; 정재복(Chung, Jae Bock)
사서에게 알리기
Files in This Item:
T201503876.pdf Download
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.