237 230

Cited 0 times in

외과 병동 환자 경장영양 관리실태

Other Titles
 The Current Status of Enteral Feeding Management in General Surgical Ward 
Authors
 김윤정  ;  백영미  ;  김소윤  ;  문미르  ;  박경희  ;  백소희  ;  서문영  ;  오숙영  ;  이은지  ;  임현빈  ;  황지예  ;  정인선  ;  이재길  ;  김경식  ;  김충배 
Citation
 Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol.7(1) : 23-27, 2015 
Journal Title
 Journal of Clinical Nutrition 
ISSN
 2289-0203 
Issue Date
2015
MeSH
Colon ; Diagnosis ; Duodenal Neoplasms ; Duodenum ; Enteral Nutrition* ; Female ; Flushing ; Hemoperitoneum ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Jejunum ; Korea ; Male ; Nutritional Support ; Pancreas ; Peritonitis ; Rectal Neoplasms ; Residual Volume ; Retrospective Studies ; Seoul ; Stomach
Keywords
Enteral nutrition ; Standardized guideline ; The current state of enteral feeding management ; A standardized protocol on charting
Abstract
PURPOSE: Development of a standardized guideline and assessment tool is necessary. Therefore, the aim is to investigate the current state of enteral feeding management and to develop a basis for a standardized guideline. METHODS: From July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011, this study was conducted retrospectively for 100 patients who had enteral feeding more than once only in the Intensive Care Unit, after General Surgery at Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. The analysis was based on the following factors; age, diagnosis, name of the operation, period of start and the end of enteral feeding, method of injection, flushing method, residual volumes of the stomach, location and the size of the tube, medication through tubing, and complications related to enteral feeding. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 60.5, 65 men and 35 women. There were 30 malignant tumors of the hepatobiliary system and pancreas, 8 gastric and duodenal cancer, 4 colon and rectal cancer, 11 peritonitis, hemoperitoneum, and bowel obstruction, and 47 others. The average period of performing enteral feeding was 11.7 days and the locations of enteral feeding tube were stomach 56%, jejunum 39%, duodenum 3%, and undescribed 2%. The methods of enteral feeding were as follows; continuous feeding 19%, cyclic feeding 75%, intermittent and bolus feeding 3%, respectively. Only 1% of patients were on flushing and 16% on stomach residual. The most common complication of enteral feeding was clogging of the tube (5%). CONCLUSION: Due to the lack of detailed charting related to enteral feeding, we were unable to analyze the statistics on the relevance of complication which was the primary endpoint. As a result, development of a standardized protocol on charting enteral feeding is suggested for optimal enteral nutritional support.
Files in This Item:
T201501458.pdf Download
DOI
10.15747/jcn.2015.7.1.23
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Kyung Sik(김경식) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9498-284X
Kim, Choong Bai(김충배)
Lee, Jae Gil(이재길) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1148-8035
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/140146
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse