208 197

Cited 9 times in

Retrospective assessment of the validity of robotic surgery in comparison to open surgery for pediatric choledochal cyst

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author김나영-
dc.contributor.author김하얀-
dc.contributor.author박시민-
dc.contributor.author배선준-
dc.contributor.author장은영-
dc.contributor.author한석주-
dc.contributor.author홍영주-
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-04T11:14:02Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-04T11:14:02Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn0513-5796-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/139964-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: We evaluated the validity of robotic surgery (RS) for pediatric choledochal cyst (CC) in comparison to open surgery (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2009 to April 2013, clinical data from 79 consecutive pediatric patients with CC, who underwent RS (n=36) or OS (n=43) performed by a single pediatric surgeon, were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: In the RS group, the age of the patients was significantly older, compared to the OS group. Operation and anesthesia times were significantly longer in the RS group than the OS group. Fluid input rates to maintain the same urine output were significantly smaller in the RS group than the OS group. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, length of postoperative hospital stay, and the incidence of surgical complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Although early complications could not be avoided during the development of robotic surgical techniques, RS for pediatric CC showed results comparable to those for OS. We believe that RS may be a valid and alternative surgery for pediatric CC. After further development of robotic surgical systems and advancement of surgical techniques therewith, future prospective studies may reveal more positive results.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent737~743-
dc.relation.isPartOfYonsei Medical Journal-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleRetrospective assessment of the validity of robotic surgery in comparison to open surgery for pediatric choledochal cyst-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Surgery (외과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNa Young Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun Young Chang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Ju Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSimin Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHa Yan Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSun-Joon Bai-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeok Joo Han-
dc.identifier.doi10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.737-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA01553-
dc.contributor.localIdA01795-
dc.contributor.localIdA03459-
dc.contributor.localIdA04288-
dc.contributor.localIdA04417-
dc.contributor.localIdA01091-
dc.contributor.localIdA00348-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02813-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Na Young-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Ha Yan-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Si Min-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameBai, Sun Joon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChang, Eun Young-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHan, Seok Joo-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHong, Young Ju-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Si Min-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorBai, Sun Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChang, Eun Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHan, Seok Joo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Young Ju-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Ha Yan-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Na Young-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume56-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage737-
dc.citation.endPage743-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationYonsei Medical Journal, Vol.56(3) : 737-743, 2015-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Yonsei Biomedical Research Center (연세의생명연구원) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.