365 418

Cited 200 times in

Impact of bone and liver metastases on patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy.

Authors
 Rana R. McKay  ;  Nils Kroeger  ;  Wanling Xie  ;  Jae Lyun Lee  ;  Jennifer J. Knox  ;  Georg A. Bjarnason  ;  Mary J. MacKenzie  ;  Lori Wood  ;  Sandy Srinivas  ;  Ulka N. Vaishampayan  ;  Sun Young Rha  ;  Sumanta K. Pal  ;  Frede Donskov  ;  Srinivas K. Tantravahi  ;  Brian I. Rini  ;  Daniel Y. C. Heng  ;  Toni K. Choueiri 
Citation
 EUROPEAN UROLOGY, Vol.65(3) : 577-584, 2014 
Journal Title
EUROPEAN UROLOGY
ISSN
 0302-2838 
Issue Date
2014
MeSH
Bone Neoplasms/secondary* ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy* ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary* ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Kidney Neoplasms/pathology* ; Liver Neoplasms/secondary* ; Male ; Molecular Targeted Therapy ; Retrospective Studies
Keywords
Bone metastases ; Liver metastases ; Outcome ; Renal cell carcinoma ; VEGF therapy ; mTOR inhibitors
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The skeleton and liver are frequently involved sites of metastasis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
OBJECTIVE: To analyze outcomes based on the presence of bone metastases (BMs) and/or liver metastases (LMs) in patients with RCC treated with targeted therapy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a review from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) of 2027 patients with metastatic RCC.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We analyzed the impact of the site of metastasis on overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure. Statistical analyses were performed using multivariable Cox regression.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The presence of BMs was 34% overall, and when stratified by IMDC risk groups was 27%, 33%, and 43% in the favorable-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups, respectively (p<0.001). The presence of LMs was 19% overall and higher in the poor-risk patients (23%) compared with the favorable- or intermediate-risk groups (17%) (p=0.003). When patients were classified into four groups based on the presence of BMs and/or LMs, the hazard ratio, adjusted for IMDC risk factors, was 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.62) for BMs, 1.42 (95% CI, 1.17-1.73) for LMs, and 1.82 (95% CI, 1.47-2.26) for both BMs and LMs compared with other metastatic sites (p<0.0001). The prediction model performance for OS was significantly improved when BMs and LMs were added to the IMDC prognostic model (likelihood ratio test p<0.0001). Data in this analysis were collected retrospectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of BMs and LMs in patients treated with targeted agents has a negative impact on survival. Patients with BMs and/or LMs may benefit from earlier inclusion on clinical trials of novel agents or combination-based therapies.
Files in This Item:
T201405191.pdf Download
DOI
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.012
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Rha, Sun Young(라선영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2512-4531
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/138652
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links