255 375

Cited 0 times in

성인의 척추분리형 척추전방전위증에서 후방 추체간 유합술과 척추경 나사못을 이용한 후외방 유합술의 결과 비교

Other Titles
 Comparison between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Fixation and Posterolateral Fusion with Pedicle Screw Fixation in Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis in Adults 
Authors
 진택수  ;  문성환  ;  이환모  ;  박건보  ;  김남현 
Citation
 Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery (대한척추외과학회지), Vol.10(2) : 104-112, 2003 
Journal Title
 Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery (대한척추외과학회지) 
ISSN
 2093-4378 
Issue Date
2003
MeSH
Spondylolytic spondylolisthesis ; Posterior lumbar interbody fusion ; Posterolateral fusion ; Pedicle screw fixation
Keywords
Spondylolytic spondylolisthesis ; Posterior lumbar interbody fusion ; Posterolateral fusion ; Pedicle screw fixation
Abstract
Study design: This was a retrospective study that analyzed and compared the results between a posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and a posterolateral fusion (PLIF+PLF), and PLF alone, in the treatment of spondyolytic spondylolisthesis in adults. Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of two surgical treatment methods for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis-posterolateral fusion alone, and circurnferential fusion, using posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion. Summary of Literature Review: There have been many reports regarding the surgical treatment of spondytolisthesis. Posterior lumbar interbody fusions have certain distinct mechanical advantages over posterolateral ones. However, the clinical and radiological results do not usually correlate. Materials and Methods: Between January 1998 and December 2001.38 patients, with spondylolytic spondylolisthesis, were operated on by a single surgeon. Nineteen patients underwent a posterolateral fusion alone (group I), with the same number undergoing an additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (groupⅡ). These two groups were evaluated for their clinical outcomes, radiological measurements and fusion rates. Results: The losses in the slip reduction were 7.1 and 1.3% in the PLF and PLF+PLIF groups, respectively (P<0.05). The losses in the Meschan angle were 3.3 and 0.2 in the PLF and PLF+PLIF groups, respectively (P<0.05). The losses in the disc height restoration were 10.4 and 3.8% in the PLF and PLF+PLIF groups, respectively (P<0.05). A nonunion was observed in 3 of the PLF cases (15.8%) and 1 of the PLF+PLIF (5.3%). However, the satisfactory clinical results were 84.2 and 73.7% in the PLF and PLF+PLIF groups, respectively (P>0.05). Conclusions: Although the addition of a posterior lumbar interbody fusion, to an instrumented posterolateral fusion, following decompression, is more predictable in maintaining a correction and achieving union, a posterolateral fusion may have a better clinical outcome in patients with low grade spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Therefore, careful patient selection is necessary for each operation.
Files in This Item:
T200305731.pdf Download
DOI
10.4184/jkss.2003.10.2.104
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Moon, Seong Hwan(문성환)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/114194
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links