1 444

Cited 11 times in

The optimum bolus dose of remifentanil to facilitate laryngeal mask airway insertion with a single standard dose of propofol at induction in children.

Authors
 H. J. Kwak  ;  J. Y. Kim  ;  Y. B. Kim  ;  Y. J. Chae  ;  J. Y. Kim 
Citation
 ANAESTHESIA, Vol.63(9) : 954-958, 2008 
Journal Title
ANAESTHESIA
ISSN
 0003-2409 
Issue Date
2008
MeSH
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures ; Anesthetics, Combined/administration & dosage* ; Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage* ; Blood Pressure/drug effects ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Female ; Heart Rate/drug effects ; Humans ; Laryngeal Masks* ; Male ; Piperidines/administration & dosage* ; Propofol/administration & dosage* ; Remifentanil
Keywords
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures ; Anesthetics, Combined/administration & dosage* ; Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage* ; Blood Pressure/drug effects ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Female ; Heart Rate/drug effects ; Humans ; Laryngeal Masks* ; Male ; Piperidines/administration & dosage* ; Propofol/administration & dosage* ; Remifentanil
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal bolus dose of remifentanil required for the successful insertion of the laryngeal mask airway during propofol induction in children without a neuromuscular blocking agent. Twenty-six paediatric patients, aged 3-10 years, requiring anaesthesia for short ambulatory surgery were recruited. A predetermined bolus dose of remifentanil was injected over 30 s, followed by propofol 2.5 mg.kg(-1) over 10 s. The bolus dose of remifentanil was determined by a modified Dixon's up-and-down method, starting from 0.5 microg.kg(-1) (0.1 microg.kg(-1) as a step size). Laryngeal mask insertion was attempted 90 s after the end of remifentanil injection and the response of patients was classified as either 'movement' or 'no movement'. The bolus dose of remifentanil at which there was a 50% probability of successful laryngeal mask insertion (ED(50)) during induction with 2.5 mg.kg(-1) propofol was 0.56 (0.07) microg.kg(-1) in children without a neuromuscular blocking agent. From probit analysis, the ED(50) and ED(95) of remifentanil were 0.52 microg.kg(-1) (95% confidence limits, 0.42-0.62 microg.kg(-1)) and 0.71 microg.kg(-1) (95% confidence limits, 0.61-1.40 microg.kg(-1)), respectively.
Full Text
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05544.x/abstract
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05544.x
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Ji Young(김지영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5822-0338
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/107520
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links