4 560

Cited 38 times in

Sphincter-preserving operations following preoperative chemoradiation: an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer?

Authors
 Jung Wook Huh  ;  Eun Joo Jung  ;  Yoon Ah Park  ;  Kang Young Lee  ;  Seung-Kook Sohn 
Citation
 WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Vol.32(6) : 1116-1123, 2008 
Journal Title
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN
 0364-2313 
Issue Date
2008
MeSH
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy ; Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy ; Adenocarcinoma/surgery* ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anal Canal/surgery ; Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage* ; Colectomy/methods* ; Female ; Fluorouracil/administration & dosage* ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Rectum/surgery* ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Rectal Cancer ; Anterior Resection ; Total Mesorectal Excision ; Oncologic Outcome ; Advanced Rectal Cancer
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sphincter-preserving operations (SPO) for lower rectal cancer are on the rise. In the study reported here, we compared the oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent sphincter-preserving operations following preoperative chemoradiation for lower rectal cancer with the outcome for patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR).

METHODS: This prospective study included 87 patients who underwent proctectomy with curative intent for locally advanced rectal cancer that was located less than 6 cm from the anal verge. Forty-four patients had APR with no preoperative treatment. Forty-three patients underwent concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) consisting of preoperative 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and pelvic radiation (4500-5040 cGy); this was followed 6 weeks later by surgery (SPO/CCRT). The oncologic outcomes between the two groups were compared, and factors affecting survival were evaluated.

RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 56.2 months. The overall postoperative complication rates did not significantly differ between SPO/CCRT and APR (32.6% versus 34.2%; p = 0.879). Also, there were no significant differences in the overall recurrence rate (20.9% versus 20.5%; p = 0.956) and 5-year overall survival rate (70.8% versus 62.9%; p = 0.189) between the two groups. By multivariate analysis, only the pathologic N stage was significantly associated with overall survival (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Sphincter-preserving operation with CCRT could be another option for the treatment of locally advanced lower rectal cancer in patients who are clinically considered for APR, with no deterioration of oncologic outcomes. For patients undergoing curative resection for lower rectal cancer, the pathologic N stage can provide valuable prognostic information about survival.
Full Text
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00268-008-9520-1
DOI
10.1007/s00268-008-9520-1
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Park, Yoon Ah(박윤아)
Sohn, Seung Kook(손승국)
Lee, Kang Young(이강영)
Jung, Eun Joo(정은주) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8297-0611
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/107299
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links