1 623

Cited 52 times in

Mortality and technique failure in peritoneal dialysis patients using advanced peritoneal dialysis solutions.

Authors
 Seung Hyeok Han  ;  Song Vogue Ahn  ;  Jee Young Yun  ;  Anders Tranaeus  ;  Dae-Suk Han 
Citation
 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, Vol.54(4) : 711-720, 2009 
Journal Title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
ISSN
 0272-6386 
Issue Date
2009
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Blood Glucose/metabolism ; Dialysis Solutions/therapeutic use* ; Female ; Glucans/therapeutic use ; Glucose/therapeutic use ; Glycation End Products, Advanced/metabolism ; Humans ; Kidney Diseases/therapy ; Korea ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peritoneal Dialysis/methods* ; Peritoneal Dialysis/mortality* ; Research Design ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Biocompatibility ; bicarbonate/lactate ; low glucose degradation product (GDP) ; icodextrin ; peritoneal dialysis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the theoretical benefits of biocompatible physiological-pH bicarbonate/lactate-buffered (B/L) peritoneal dialysis solution, there is only limited evidence supporting a superior clinical outcome associated with its use.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational study.

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: 2,163 patients starting peritoneal dialysis therapy between July 2003 and December 2006 from 54 centers in Korea were enrolled.

PREDICTORS: B/L solution and icodextrin use.

OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality and technique failure.

MEASUREMENTS: Patient outcomes were compared between patients prescribed B/L and conventional solutions by using propensity score and intention-to-treat analyses.

RESULTS: 542 patients initiated peritoneal dialysis therapy with B/L solution, and 1,621, with conventional solution. Fifteen patients prescribed B/L solution switched to conventional solution, and 386 of those initially using conventional solution switched to B/L solution during follow-up. Propensity score matching yielded 542 matched pairs of patients. In the matched cohort, there were no significant differences in age, diabetes, cardiovascular comorbidity, socioeconomic status, icodextrin use, or center experience between the 2 groups. All-cause deaths occurred in 52 (9.6%) patients in the B/L-solution group compared with 102 (18.9%) in the conventional-solution group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.98; P = 0.04). In addition, icodextrin use was significantly associated with a reduced risk of death (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.58; P < 0.001). Thirty-three (6.1%) and 48 (8.9%) technique failures occurred in the B/L- and conventional-solution groups, respectively (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.43; P = 0.7). The survival benefit of B/L solution persisted in the unmatched cohort (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.93; P = 0.02).

LIMITATIONS: Retrospective analysis, lack of laboratory data, and unknown indications for use of B/L solution.

CONCLUSION: Use of a biocompatible B/L peritoneal dialysis solution with physiological pH is associated with improved survival compared with conventional solution. Large randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm this finding
Full Text
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272638609008609
DOI
10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.05.014
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Han, Dae Suk(한대석)
Han, Seung Jin(한승진)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/106050
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links