Cited 1 times in

Acute toxicity of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor rofecoxib as a radiosensitizer for concurrent chemoradiation in the treatment of uterine cervical cance

Authors
 Yong Wook Jung  ;  San Hui Lee  ;  Ji Heum Paek  ;  Eun Ji Nam  ;  Sang Wun Kim  ;  Jae Hoon Kim  ;  Jae Wook Kim  ;  Young Tae Kim 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, Vol.20(3) : 151-157, 2009 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
ISSN
 2005-0380 
Issue Date
2009
Keywords
Cervical cancer ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Efficacy ; Rofecoxib ; Toxicity
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acute toxicity of rofecoxib during concurrent use with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with cervical cancer.

METHODS: We evaluated 67 FIGO stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer patients treated with CCRT between June 2002 and July 2004. The study group included patients who received rofecoxib (N=30) and the control group included patients who received CCRT only (N=37). The patients' medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, toxicity related to CCRT and treatment results.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences in toxicity between the two groups. The most common acute grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (13.3% in the study group and 21.6% in the control group). Grade 3/4 late toxicity was observed in 2 (6.6%) patients in the study group and 3 (8.1%) in the control group. There was no treatment-related deaths in either group. Six (20.0%) patients in the study group had treatment failure. In the control group, 6 (16.2%) patients experienced treatment failure. Progression-free and overall survival was 55.8+/-4.2 and 59.0+/-2.8 months, respectively, in the study group, and 69.7+/-4.3 and 71.6+/-3.6 months, respectively, in the control group. There were no differences in progression-free and overall survival between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that rofecoxib, at a dose of 25 mg twice daily, has acceptable acute toxicity as a radiosensitizer during CCRT. Although rofecoxib was not efficacious as a radiosensitizer in the present study, the benefit of rofecoxib as a radiosensitizer should be further evaluated in a prospective study.
Files in This Item:
T200903353.pdf Download
DOI
10.3802/jgo.2009.20.3.151
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Sang Wun(김상운) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8342-8701
Kim, Young Tae(김영태) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-1052
Kim, Jae Wook(김재욱)
Kim, Jae Hoon(김재훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6599-7065
Nam, Eun Ji(남은지) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0189-3560
Paek, Ji Heum(백지흠)
Lee, San Hui(이산희)
Jung, Yong Wook(정용욱)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/104938
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links