2 487

Cited 50 times in

Clinical significance of early recurrences of atrial tachycardia after atrial fibrillation ablation

Authors
 JONG-IL CHOI  ;  HUI-NAM PAK  ;  JAE SEOK PARK  ;  JAE JIN KWAK  ;  YASUTSUGU NAGAMOTO  ;  HONG EUY LIM  ;  SANG WEON PARK  ;  CHUN HWANG  ;  YOUNG-HOON KIM 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, Vol.21(12) : 1331-1337, 2010 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
ISSN
 1045-3873 
Issue Date
2010
MeSH
Aged ; Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology ; Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology* ; Atrial Fibrillation/surgery* ; Catheter Ablation/adverse effects* ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Tachycardia, Supraventricular/epidemiology ; Tachycardia, Supraventricular/etiology ; Tachycardia, Supraventricular/physiopathology* ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
atrial fibrillation ; catheter ablation ; early recurrence ; atrial tachycardia
Abstract
BACKGROUND: atrial tachycardia (AT) commonly recurs within 3 months after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it remains unclear whether early recurrence of atrial tachycardia (ERAT) predicts late recurrence of AF or AT.

METHODS: of 352 consecutive patients who underwent circumferential pulmonary vein isolation with or without linear ablation(s) for AF, 56 patients (15.9%) with ERAT were identified by retrospective analysis. ERAT was defined as early relapse of AT within a 3-month blanking period after ablation.

RESULTS: during 21.7 ± 12.5 months, the rate of late recurrence was higher in patients with ERAT (41.1%) compared with those without ERAT (11.8%, P < 0.001). In a multivariable model, positive inducibility of AF or AT immediately after ablation (65.2% vs 36.4%, P = 0.046; odd ratio, 3.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-14.6) and the number of patients who underwent cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation (73.9% vs 42.4%, P = 0.042; odd ratio, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-19.5) were significantly related to late recurrence in the ERAT group. The duration of ablation (174.3 ± 62.3 vs 114.7 ± 39.5 minutes, P = 0.046) and the procedure time (329.3 ± 83.4 vs 279.2 ± 79.7 minutes, P = 0.027) were significantly longer in patients with late recurrence than in those without late recurrence following ERAT.

CONCLUSIONS: the late recurrence rate is higher in the patients with ERAT compared with those without ERAT following AF ablation, and is more often noted in the patients who underwent CTI ablation and had a prolonged procedure time. Furthermore, inducibility of AF or AT immediately after ablation independently predicts late recurrence in patients with ERAT.
Full Text
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01831.x/abstract
DOI
10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01831.x
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Pak, Hui Nam(박희남) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3256-3620
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/103114
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links