1 207

Cited 26 times in

Comparison of a newly designed double-layered combination covered stent and D-weave uncovered stent for decompression of obstructive colorectal cancer: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors
 Chang Mo Moon  ;  Tae Il Kim  ;  Moon Sung Lee  ;  Bong Min Ko  ;  Hyun Soo Kim  ;  Kang-Moon Lee  ;  Jeong-Sik Byeon  ;  Yong Sik Kim 
Citation
 Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Vol.53(8) : 1190-1196, 2010 
Journal Title
 Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 
ISSN
 0012-3706 
Issue Date
2010
MeSH
Aged ; Coated Materials, Biocompatible* ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal Neoplasms/complications* ; Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery ; Decompression, Surgical/instrumentation* ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intestinal Obstruction/diagnosis ; Intestinal Obstruction/etiology ; Intestinal Obstruction/surgery* ; Male ; Prospective Studies ; Prosthesis Design ; Radiography, Abdominal ; Stents* ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Malignant obstruction ; Colorectal cancer ; Self-expandable metal stent
Abstract
PURPOSE: Stent reocclusion and migration are the most important complications after stent insertion. To overcome both problems, a double-layered combination covered stent was developed. Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of the newly designed double-layered combination covered stent (Niti-S enteral colonic stent, Comvi type) and the double-wire woven uncovered stent (Niti-S enteral colonic stent, D-type) in the treatment of malignant colorectal obstructions. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with obstructive colorectal cancer underwent stent placement for preoperative decompression (n = 30) or palliative purpose (n = 38) at 6 medical centers. Combination covered stents were used in 31 patients and uncovered stents were used in 37 patients. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between both stents in terms of technical and clinical success rates. Regarding complications after stent insertion, there was no significant difference in early stent occlusion and migration rate between the combination covered stents and the uncovered stents. Despite a trend toward lower rates of late stent occlusion in the combination covered stent group, there was no significant difference in the rate of late stent occlusion by tumor ingrowth between the 2 groups (0% vs 20%, respectively; P = .107), and late stent migration occurred significantly more often with the combination covered stent (22.2% vs 0%, respectively; P = .041). However, we observed no significant difference in the overall late-complication rates and stent patency duration between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we could not prove that the newly designed double-layered combination covered stents have preventive advantages in stent migration compared with the uncovered stent.
Full Text
http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00003453-201008000-00015&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
DOI
10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e28847
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Tae Il(김태일) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4807-890X
Moon, Chang Mo(문창모)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/101703
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse