2 666

Cited 27 times in

A comparison of tapered and cylindrical miniscrew stability

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김지영-
dc.contributor.author박영철-
dc.contributor.author차정열-
dc.contributor.author황충주-
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-06T17:33:16Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-06T17:33:16Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn0141-5387-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/100196-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: This study compared the stability of tapered miniscrews with cylindrical miniscrews. MATERIALS/METHODS: One hundred and five tapered and 122 cylindrical self-drilling miniscrews were placed into the maxillary and mandibular buccal alveolar areas of 132 patients (43 males and 89 females). The insertion torque and removal torque were measured and Periotest values (PTVs) were recorded at implantation. RESULTS: The success rates of the tapered and cylindrical miniscrews examined were similar. In the maxilla, the insertion torque of the tapered miniscrews (8.3 Ncm) was significantly higher than that of the cylindrical miniscrews (6.3 Ncm) (P < 0.05). The PTVs of the tapered miniscrews were statistically significantly lower in the maxilla (P < 0.05). The removal torque values showed no significant difference between the tapered and cylindrical miniscrews in the upper and lower buccal areas (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tapered miniscrews had higher initial stability when compared to cylindrical miniscrews, whereas the clinical success rates and removal torques were similar between the two designs. The long-term stability is not directly affected by the miniscrew design.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent557~562-
dc.relation.isPartOfEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHBone Screws*-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMandible/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHMaxilla/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHOrthodontic Anchorage Procedures/instrumentation*-
dc.subject.MESHOrthodontic Appliance Design*-
dc.subject.MESHOsseointegration/physiology-
dc.subject.MESHTorque-
dc.titleA comparison of tapered and cylindrical miniscrew stability-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Dentistry (치과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Orthodontics (교정과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeong-Hun Yoo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung-Chel Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChung-Ju Hwang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi-Young Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun-Hee Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung-Yul Cha-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejo/cjt092-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA01573-
dc.contributor.localIdA04006-
dc.contributor.localIdA04492-
dc.contributor.localIdA00976-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00837-
dc.identifier.eissn1460-2210-
dc.identifier.pmid24355870-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/content/36/5/557.long-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Ji Young-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Young Chel-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCha, Jung Yul-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHwang, Chung Ju-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Young Chel-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorCha, Jung Yul-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHwang, Chung Ju-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Ji Young-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume36-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage557-
dc.citation.endPage562-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, Vol.36(5) : 557-562, 2014-
dc.identifier.rimsid51743-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Orthodontics (교정과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.