29 68

Cited 16 times in

Pembrolizumab Plus Olaparib for Patients With Previously Treated and Biomarker-Unselected Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III KEYLYNK-010 Trial

Authors
 Emmanuel S Antonarakis  ;  Se Hoon Park  ;  Jeffrey C Goh  ;  Sang Joon Shin  ;  Jae Lyun Lee  ;  Niven Mehra  ;  Ray McDermott  ;  Núria Sala-Gonzalez  ;  Peter C Fong  ;  Richard Greil  ;  Margitta Retz  ;  Juan Pablo Sade  ;  Patricio Yanez  ;  Yi-Hsiu Huang  ;  Stephen D Begbie  ;  Rustem Airatovich Gafanov  ;  Maria De Santis  ;  Eli Rosenbaum  ;  Michael P Kolinsky  ;  Felipe Rey  ;  Kun-Yuan Chiu  ;  Guilhem Roubaud  ;  Gero Kramer  ;  Makoto Sumitomo  ;  Francesco Massari  ;  Hiroyoshi Suzuki  ;  Ping Qiu  ;  Jinchun Zhang  ;  Jeri Kim  ;  Christian H Poehlein  ;  Evan Y Yu 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.41(22) : 3839-3850, 2023-08 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN
 0732-183X 
Issue Date
2023-08
MeSH
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects ; Biomarkers ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Male ; Prednisone ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant* / pathology ; Treatment Outcome
Abstract
Purpose: There is an unmet need for therapeutic options that prolong survival for patients with heavily pretreated, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The phase III, open-label KEYLYNK-010 study evaluated pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus a next-generation hormonal agent (NHA) for biomarker-unselected, previously treated mCRPC.

Methods: Eligible participants had mCRPC that progressed on or after abiraterone or enzalutamide (but not both) and docetaxel. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to pembrolizumab plus olaparib or NHA (abiraterone or enzalutamide). The dual primary end points were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) by blinded independent central review per Prostate Cancer Working Group-modified RECIST 1.1 and overall survival (OS). Time to first subsequent therapy (TFST) was a key secondary end point. Safety and objective response rate (ORR) were secondary end points.

Results: Between May 30, 2019, and July 16, 2021, 529 participants were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus olaparib and 264 to NHA. At final rPFS analysis, median rPFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 6.0) with pembrolizumab plus olaparib and 4.2 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 6.1) with NHA (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02 [95% CI, 0.82 to 1.25]; P = .55). At final OS analysis, median OS was 15.8 months (95% CI, 14.6 to 17.0) and 14.6 months (95% CI, 12.6 to 17.3), respectively (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.14]; P = .26). At final TFST analysis, median TFST was 7.2 months (95% CI, 6.7 to 8.1) versus 5.7 months (95% CI, 5.0 to 7.1), respectively (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.03]). ORR was higher with pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus NHA (16.8% v 5.9%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 34.6% and 9.0% of participants, respectively.

Conclusion: Pembrolizumab plus olaparib did not significantly improve rPFS or OS versus NHA in participants with biomarker-unselected, heavily pretreated mCRPC. The study was stopped for futility. No new safety signals occurred.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03834519.
Files in This Item:
T202307048.pdf Download
DOI
10.1200/JCO.23.00233
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Shin, Sang Joon(신상준) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5350-7241
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/197439
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links