32 74

Cited 23 times in

Pembrolizumab Plus Olaparib for Patients With Previously Treated and Biomarker-Unselected Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III KEYLYNK-010 Trial

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author신상준-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-03T01:02:13Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-03T01:02:13Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-
dc.identifier.issn0732-183X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/197439-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: There is an unmet need for therapeutic options that prolong survival for patients with heavily pretreated, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The phase III, open-label KEYLYNK-010 study evaluated pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus a next-generation hormonal agent (NHA) for biomarker-unselected, previously treated mCRPC. Methods: Eligible participants had mCRPC that progressed on or after abiraterone or enzalutamide (but not both) and docetaxel. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to pembrolizumab plus olaparib or NHA (abiraterone or enzalutamide). The dual primary end points were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) by blinded independent central review per Prostate Cancer Working Group-modified RECIST 1.1 and overall survival (OS). Time to first subsequent therapy (TFST) was a key secondary end point. Safety and objective response rate (ORR) were secondary end points. Results: Between May 30, 2019, and July 16, 2021, 529 participants were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus olaparib and 264 to NHA. At final rPFS analysis, median rPFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 6.0) with pembrolizumab plus olaparib and 4.2 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 6.1) with NHA (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02 [95% CI, 0.82 to 1.25]; P = .55). At final OS analysis, median OS was 15.8 months (95% CI, 14.6 to 17.0) and 14.6 months (95% CI, 12.6 to 17.3), respectively (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.14]; P = .26). At final TFST analysis, median TFST was 7.2 months (95% CI, 6.7 to 8.1) versus 5.7 months (95% CI, 5.0 to 7.1), respectively (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.03]). ORR was higher with pembrolizumab plus olaparib versus NHA (16.8% v 5.9%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 34.6% and 9.0% of participants, respectively. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab plus olaparib did not significantly improve rPFS or OS versus NHA in participants with biomarker-unselected, heavily pretreated mCRPC. The study was stopped for futility. No new safety signals occurred. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03834519.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHBiomarkers-
dc.subject.MESHDisease-Free Survival-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHPrednisone-
dc.subject.MESHProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant* / pathology-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titlePembrolizumab Plus Olaparib for Patients With Previously Treated and Biomarker-Unselected Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III KEYLYNK-010 Trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEmmanuel S Antonarakis-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSe Hoon Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeffrey C Goh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Joon Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Lyun Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNiven Mehra-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRay McDermott-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNúria Sala-Gonzalez-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPeter C Fong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRichard Greil-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMargitta Retz-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJuan Pablo Sade-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPatricio Yanez-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYi-Hsiu Huang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorStephen D Begbie-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRustem Airatovich Gafanov-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMaria De Santis-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEli Rosenbaum-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMichael P Kolinsky-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFelipe Rey-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKun-Yuan Chiu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGuilhem Roubaud-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGero Kramer-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMakoto Sumitomo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFrancesco Massari-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHiroyoshi Suzuki-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPing Qiu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJinchun Zhang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeri Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChristian H Poehlein-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEvan Y Yu-
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.23.00233-
dc.contributor.localIdA02105-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01331-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-7755-
dc.identifier.pmid37290035-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameShin, Sang Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor신상준-
dc.citation.volume41-
dc.citation.number22-
dc.citation.startPage3839-
dc.citation.endPage3850-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.41(22) : 3839-3850, 2023-08-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.