33 109

Cited 0 times in

Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term comparison of outcomes

Authors
 Kyung Jin Eoh  ;  Tae-Joong Kim  ;  Jeong-Yeol Park  ;  Hee Seung Kim  ;  Jiheum Paek  ;  Young Tae Kim 
Citation
 FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, Vol.13 : 1219371, 2023-09 
Journal Title
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Issue Date
2023-09
Keywords
endometrial neoplasms ; laparoscopy ; mortality ; postoperative complications ; robotic surgical procedures
Abstract
Objective: There is a lack of multi-institutional large-volume and long-term follow-up data on comparisons between robot-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery. This study compared the surgical and long-term survival outcomes between patients who underwent robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients from five large academic institutions who underwent either robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of endometrial cancer between 2012 and 2017, ensuring at least 5 years of potential follow-up. Intra- and postoperative outcomes, long-term disease-free survival, and overall survival were compared.

Results: The study cohort included 1,003 unselected patients: 551 and 452 patients received conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 57 months. Postoperative complications were significantly less likely to occur in the robot-assisted surgery group compared to the laparoscopic surgery group (7.74% vs. 13.79%, P = 0.002), primarily limited to minor complications. There were no significant differences in survival: 5-year disease-free survival was 91.2% versus 90.0% (P = 0.628) and overall survival was 97.9% versus 96.8% (P = 0.285) in the robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery cohorts, respectively. Cox proportional hazard regression models demonstrated that the mode of surgery was not associated with disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.897; confidence interval, 0.563-1.429) or overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.791; confidence interval, 0.330-1.895) after adjusting for confounding factors.

Conclusion: Robot-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer demonstrates comparable long-term survival outcomes and a reduced incidence of postoperative minor complications when compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery.
Files in This Item:
T202305671.pdf Download
DOI
10.3389/fonc.2023.1219371
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Young Tae(김영태) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-1052
Eoh, Kyung Jin(어경진) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1684-2267
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/196522
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links