33 112

Cited 0 times in

Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term comparison of outcomes

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김영태-
dc.contributor.author어경진-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-07T07:48:41Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-07T07:48:41Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/196522-
dc.description.abstractObjective: There is a lack of multi-institutional large-volume and long-term follow-up data on comparisons between robot-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery. This study compared the surgical and long-term survival outcomes between patients who underwent robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients from five large academic institutions who underwent either robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of endometrial cancer between 2012 and 2017, ensuring at least 5 years of potential follow-up. Intra- and postoperative outcomes, long-term disease-free survival, and overall survival were compared. Results: The study cohort included 1,003 unselected patients: 551 and 452 patients received conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 57 months. Postoperative complications were significantly less likely to occur in the robot-assisted surgery group compared to the laparoscopic surgery group (7.74% vs. 13.79%, P = 0.002), primarily limited to minor complications. There were no significant differences in survival: 5-year disease-free survival was 91.2% versus 90.0% (P = 0.628) and overall survival was 97.9% versus 96.8% (P = 0.285) in the robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery cohorts, respectively. Cox proportional hazard regression models demonstrated that the mode of surgery was not associated with disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.897; confidence interval, 0.563-1.429) or overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.791; confidence interval, 0.330-1.895) after adjusting for confounding factors. Conclusion: Robot-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer demonstrates comparable long-term survival outcomes and a reduced incidence of postoperative minor complications when compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundation-
dc.relation.isPartOfFRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleRobot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term comparison of outcomes-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyung Jin Eoh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTae-Joong Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong-Yeol Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHee Seung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJiheum Paek-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Tae Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fonc.2023.1219371-
dc.contributor.localIdA00729-
dc.contributor.localIdA04842-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03512-
dc.identifier.eissn2234-943X-
dc.identifier.pmid37781200-
dc.subject.keywordendometrial neoplasms-
dc.subject.keywordlaparoscopy-
dc.subject.keywordmortality-
dc.subject.keywordpostoperative complications-
dc.subject.keywordrobotic surgical procedures-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Young Tae-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김영태-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor어경진-
dc.citation.volume13-
dc.citation.startPage1219371-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationFRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, Vol.13 : 1219371, 2023-09-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.