170 182

Cited 1 times in

Short-Term Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness between Long-Course Chemoradiation and Short-Course Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Authors
 Min Soo Cho  ;  Hyeon Woo Bae  ;  Jee Suk Chang  ;  Seung Yoon Yang  ;  Tae Hyun Kim  ;  Woong Sub Koom  ;  Sang Joon Shin  ;  Gyu-Seog Choi  ;  Nam Kyu Kim 
Citation
 YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, Vol.64(6) : 395-403, 2023-06 
Journal Title
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL
ISSN
 0513-5796 
Issue Date
2023-06
MeSH
Asian People ; Capecitabine / therapeutic use ; Chemoradiotherapy* / methods ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Humans ; Neoplasms, Second Primary ; Proctectomy / methods ; Radiotherapy* / methods ; Rectal Neoplasms* / drug therapy ; Rectal Neoplasms* / pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms* / radiotherapy ; Rectal Neoplasms* / surgery
Keywords
Rectal cancer ; cost effectiveness ; long-course chemoradiation ; short course radiotherapy
Abstract
Purpose: Long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) has been widely recommended in a majority of rectal cancer patients. Recently, encouraging data on short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) for rectal cancer has emerged. In this study, we aimed to compare these two methods in terms of short-term outcomes and cost analysis under the Korean medical insurance system.

Materials and methods: Sixty-two patients with high-risk rectal cancer, who underwent either SCRT or LCRT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME), were classified into two groups. Twenty-seven patients received 5 Gy×5 with two cycles of XELOX (capecitabine 1000 mg/m² and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² every 3 weeks) followed by TME (SCRT group). Thirty-five patients received capecitabine-based LCRT followed by TME (LCRT group). Short-term outcomes and cost estimation were assessed between the two groups.

Results: Pathological complete response was achieved in 18.5% and 5.7% of patients in the SCRT and LCRT groups, respectively (p=0.223). The 2-year recurrence-free survival rate did not show significant difference between the two groups (SCRT vs. LCRT: 91.9% vs. 76.2%, p=0.394). The average total cost per patient for SCRT was 18% lower for inpatient treatment (SCRT vs. LCRT: $18787 vs. $22203, p<0.001) and 40% lower for outpatient treatment (SCRT vs. LCRT: $11955 vs. $19641, p<0.001) compared to LCRT. SCRT was shown to be the dominant treatment option with fewer recurrences and fewer complications at a lower cost.

Conclusion: SCRT was well-tolerated and achieved favorable short-term outcomes. In addition, SCRT showed significant reduction in the total cost of care and distinguished cost-effectiveness compared to LCRT.
Files in This Item:
T202305163.pdf Download
DOI
10.3349/ymj.2023.0042
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
4. Graduate School of Public Health (보건대학원) > Graduate School of Public Health (보건대학원) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Koom, Woong Sub(금웅섭) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9435-7750
Kim, Nam Kyu(김남규) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0639-5632
Kim, Tae Hyun(김태현) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1053-8958
Bae, Hyeon Woo(배현우)
Shin, Sang Joon(신상준) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5350-7241
Yang, Seung Yoon(양승윤) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8129-7712
Chang, Jee Suk(장지석) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7685-3382
Cho, Min Soo(조민수)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/196340
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links