1 608

Cited 26 times in

How does distortion correction correlate with anisotropic indices? A diffusion tensor imaging study

Authors
 Dae-Jin Kim  ;  Hae-Jeong Park  ;  Kyung-Whun Kang  ;  Yong-Wook Shin  ;  Jae-Jin Kim  ;  Won-Jin Moon  ;  Eun-Chul Chung  ;  In Young Kim  ;  Jun Soo Kwon  ;  Sun I. Kim 
Citation
 MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, Vol.24(10) : 1369-1376, 2006 
Journal Title
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
ISSN
 0730-725X 
Issue Date
2006
MeSH
Adult ; Algorithms ; Anisotropy ; Brain/metabolism* ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods* ; Humans ; Image Enhancement/methods* ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted* ; Nonlinear Dynamics
Keywords
Diffusion tensor imaging ; Distortion correction ; Image registration ; Evaluation
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine a suitable registration algorithm for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) using conventional preprocessing tools [statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and automated image registration (AIR)] and to investigate how anisotropic indices for clinical assessments are affected by these distortion corrections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Brain DTI data from 15 normal healthy volunteers were used to evaluate four spatial registration schemes within subjects to correct image distortions: noncorrection, SPM-based affine registration, AIR-based affine registration and AIR-based nonlinear polynomial warping. The performance of each distortion correction was assessed using: (a) quantitative parameters: tensor-fitting error (Ef), mean dispersion index (MDI), mean fractional anisotropy (MFA) and mean variance (MV) within 11 regions of interest (ROI) defined from homogeneous fiber bundles; and (b) fiber tractography through the uncinate fasciculus and the corpus callosum. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were calculated to demonstrate the effects of distortion correction. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to investigate differences among the four registration paradigms.
RESULTS: AIR-based nonlinear registration showed the best performance for reducing image distortions with respect to smaller Ef (P<.02), MDI (P<.01) and MV (P<.01) with larger MFA (P<.01). FA was decreased to correct distortions (P<.0001) whether the applied registration was linear or nonlinear and was lowest after nonlinear correction (P<.001). No significant differences were found in MD.
CONCLUSION: In conventional DTI processing, anisotropic indices of FA can be misestimated by noncorrection or inappropriate distortion correction, which leads to an erroneous increase in FA. AIR-based nonlinear distortion correction would be required for a more accurate measurement of this diffusion parameter.
Full Text
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X06002451
DOI
10.1016/j.mri.2006.07.014
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Nuclear Medicine (핵의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Psychiatry (정신과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Jae Jin(김재진) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1395-4562
Park, Hae Jeong(박해정) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4633-0756
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/110465
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links