1 619

Cited 26 times in

How does distortion correction correlate with anisotropic indices? A diffusion tensor imaging study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김재진-
dc.contributor.author박해정-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-10T12:47:58Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-10T12:47:58Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.issn0730-725X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/110465-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine a suitable registration algorithm for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) using conventional preprocessing tools [statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and automated image registration (AIR)] and to investigate how anisotropic indices for clinical assessments are affected by these distortion corrections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Brain DTI data from 15 normal healthy volunteers were used to evaluate four spatial registration schemes within subjects to correct image distortions: noncorrection, SPM-based affine registration, AIR-based affine registration and AIR-based nonlinear polynomial warping. The performance of each distortion correction was assessed using: (a) quantitative parameters: tensor-fitting error (Ef), mean dispersion index (MDI), mean fractional anisotropy (MFA) and mean variance (MV) within 11 regions of interest (ROI) defined from homogeneous fiber bundles; and (b) fiber tractography through the uncinate fasciculus and the corpus callosum. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were calculated to demonstrate the effects of distortion correction. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to investigate differences among the four registration paradigms. RESULTS: AIR-based nonlinear registration showed the best performance for reducing image distortions with respect to smaller Ef (P<.02), MDI (P<.01) and MV (P<.01) with larger MFA (P<.01). FA was decreased to correct distortions (P<.0001) whether the applied registration was linear or nonlinear and was lowest after nonlinear correction (P<.001). No significant differences were found in MD. CONCLUSION: In conventional DTI processing, anisotropic indices of FA can be misestimated by noncorrection or inappropriate distortion correction, which leads to an erroneous increase in FA. AIR-based nonlinear distortion correction would be required for a more accurate measurement of this diffusion parameter.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent1369~1376-
dc.relation.isPartOfMAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAlgorithms-
dc.subject.MESHAnisotropy-
dc.subject.MESHBrain/metabolism*-
dc.subject.MESHDiffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHImage Enhancement/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHImage Processing, Computer-Assisted*-
dc.subject.MESHNonlinear Dynamics-
dc.titleHow does distortion correction correlate with anisotropic indices? A diffusion tensor imaging study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Nuclear Medicine (핵의학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDae-Jin Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHae-Jeong Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyung-Whun Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYong-Wook Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae-Jin Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWon-Jin Moon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun-Chul Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIn Young Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun Soo Kwon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSun I. Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.mri.2006.07.014-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00870-
dc.contributor.localIdA01730-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02178-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5894-
dc.identifier.pmid17145409-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X06002451-
dc.subject.keywordDiffusion tensor imaging-
dc.subject.keywordDistortion correction-
dc.subject.keywordImage registration-
dc.subject.keywordEvaluation-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Jae Jin-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Hae Jeong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jae Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Hae Jeong-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume24-
dc.citation.number10-
dc.citation.startPage1369-
dc.citation.endPage1376-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, Vol.24(10) : 1369-1376, 2006-
dc.identifier.rimsid39186-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Nuclear Medicine (핵의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Psychiatry (정신과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.