1 692

Cited 0 times in

Cited 27 times in

The relationship between post-stent strut apposition and follow-up strut coverage assessed by a contour plot optical coherence tomography analysis

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author고영국-
dc.contributor.author김병극-
dc.contributor.author김중선-
dc.contributor.author신동호-
dc.contributor.author장양수-
dc.contributor.author최동훈-
dc.contributor.author홍명기-
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-06T17:01:03Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-06T17:01:03Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn1936-8798-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/99210-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the relationship between post-stent strut apposition and follow-up strut coverage using contour plot optical coherence tomographic analysis. BACKGROUND:Tracking the fate of interested regions of struts at different time points has not been investigated. METHODS:Post-intervention and 6-month follow-up optical coherence tomographic evaluations were performed in 82 patients treated with biolimus- (n = 37) or sirolimus-eluting stents (n = 45). Post-stent apposition was classified as embedded, apposed, or malapposed. For volumetric stent evaluation, the post-intervention strut-artery distance and the neointimal thickness at follow-up were measured as a function of the circumferential arc length and longitudinal stent length. Computer-generated contour plots of the strut-artery distance and neointimal thickness were compared. RESULTS:The percentages of embedded and malapposed struts after intervention were 1.8% (Interquartile range [IQR]: 0.6% to 6.2%) and 2.3% (IQR: 0.5% to 5.2%), respectively. The percentages of uncovered and malapposed struts at 6 months were 16.0% (IQR: 7.4% to 33.3%) and 0% (IQR: 0% to 0.7%), respectively. The percentage of uncovered struts at 6 months varied significantly with post-stent strut apposition (0% [IQR: 0% to 11.4%] in embedded, 16.3% [IQR: 8.1% to 31.3%] in apposed, and 26.8% [IQR: 0% to 56.3%] in malapposed, p < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons). In lesions without tissue prolapse, embedded struts were all covered (100% covered struts) compared with those with tissue prolapse (76.8% covered, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:The optical coherence tomography-guided optimization of stent strut apposition enhances strut coverage at follow-up. This comprehensive method for evaluating strut apposition may provide more useful information to understanding the serial changes in strut coverage. (Neointimal Coverage After Implantation of Biolimus Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer: Optical Coherence Tomographic Assessment According to the Treatment of Dyslipidemia and Hypertension and the Types of Implanted Drug-Eluting Stents; NCT01502904).-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent641~651-
dc.relation.isPartOfJACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Disease/diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Disease/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Vessels/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Vessels/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHDrug-Eluting Stents*-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHProsthesis Design-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHTime Factors-
dc.subject.MESHTomography, Optical Coherence/methods*-
dc.titleThe relationship between post-stent strut apposition and follow-up strut coverage assessed by a contour plot optical coherence tomography analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung-Sun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJinyong Ha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByeong-Keuk Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong-Ho Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung-Guk Ko-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDonghoon Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYangsoo Jang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong-Ki Hong-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcin.2013.12.205-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00127-
dc.contributor.localIdA00493-
dc.contributor.localIdA00961-
dc.contributor.localIdA02097-
dc.contributor.localIdA03448-
dc.contributor.localIdA04053-
dc.contributor.localIdA04391-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01193-
dc.identifier.eissn1876-7605-
dc.identifier.pmid24835329-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936879814006025-
dc.subject.keyworddrug-eluting stent-
dc.subject.keywordmalapposition-
dc.subject.keywordoptical coherence tomography-
dc.subject.keywordstent coverage-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKo, Young Guk-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Byeong Keuk-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Jung Sun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameShin, Dong Ho-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameJang, Yang Soo-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Dong Hoon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHong, Myeong Ki-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKo, Young Guk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Byeong Keuk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Jung Sun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShin, Dong Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJang, Yang Soo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Dong Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Myeong Ki-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume7-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.startPage641-
dc.citation.endPage651-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, Vol.7(6) : 641-651, 2014-
dc.identifier.rimsid55937-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.