4 740

Cited 57 times in

Respirophasic carotid artery peak velocity variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with coronary artery disease

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author송영-
dc.contributor.author송종욱-
dc.contributor.author심재광-
dc.contributor.author곽영란-
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-06T16:52:10Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-06T16:52:10Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn0007-0912-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/98926-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: We studied respirophasic variation in carotid artery blood flow peak velocity (ΔVpeak-CA) measured by pulsed wave Doppler ultrasound as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery were enrolled. Subjects were classified as responders if stroke volume index (SVI) increased ≥15% after volume expansion (6 ml kg(-1)). The ΔVpeak-CA was calculated as the difference between the maximum and minimum values of peak velocity over a single respiratory cycle, divided by the average. Central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, pulse pressure variation (PPV), and ΔVpeak-CA were recorded before and after volume expansion. RESULTS: PPV and ΔVpeak-CA correlated significantly with an increase in SVI after volume expansion. Area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of PPV and ΔVpeak-CA were 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-0.90] and 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-0.97). The optimal cut-off values for fluid responsiveness of PPV and ΔVpeak-CA were 13% (sensitivity and specificity of 0.74 and 0.71) and 11% (sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 and 0.82), respectively. In a subgroup analysis of 17 subjects having pulse pressure hypertension (≥ 60 mm Hg), PPV failed to predict fluid responsiveness (AUROC 0.70, P=0.163), whereas the predictability of ΔVpeak-CA remained unchanged (AUROC 0.90, P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Doppler assessment of respirophasic ΔVpeak-CA seems to be a highly feasible and reliable method to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing coronary revascularization.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent61~66-
dc.relation.isPartOfBRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAnesthesia, General/methods-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Flow Velocity/physiology-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Pressure/physiology-
dc.subject.MESHCarotid Arteries/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHCarotid Arteries/physiopathology*-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Bypass-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Disease/physiopathology-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Disease/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Disease/therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHFeasibility Studies-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFluid Therapy/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHHemodynamics/physiology-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHMonitoring, Intraoperative/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHRespiration, Artificial/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHRespiratory Rate/physiology-
dc.subject.MESHUltrasonography, Doppler, Pulsed/methods-
dc.titleRespirophasic carotid artery peak velocity variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with coronary artery disease-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Anesthesiology (마취통증의학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorY. Song-
dc.contributor.googleauthorY. L. Kwak-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJ. W. Song-
dc.contributor.googleauthorY. J. Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJ. K. Shim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bja/aeu057-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA02205-
dc.contributor.localIdA00172-
dc.contributor.localIdA02036-
dc.contributor.localIdA02060-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00405-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-6771-
dc.identifier.pmid24722322-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://bja.oxfordjournals.org/content/113/1/61.long-
dc.subject.keywordDoppler ultrasound-
dc.subject.keywordblood flow velocity-
dc.subject.keywordcarotid artery-
dc.subject.keywordfluid therapy-
dc.subject.keywordmechanical ventilation-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSong, Young-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSong, Jong Wook-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameShim, Jae Kwang-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKwak, Young Lan-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShim, Jae Kwang-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKwak, Young Lan-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSong, Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSong, Jong Wook-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume113-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage61-
dc.citation.endPage66-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, Vol.113(1) : 61-66, 2014-
dc.identifier.rimsid53785-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.