1 484

Cited 154 times in

Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Colorectal Surgery Compared with laparoscopic and Open Surgery: a Systematic Review

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김창우-
dc.contributor.author김창희-
dc.contributor.author백승혁-
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-06T16:37:30Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-06T16:37:30Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn1091-255X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/98453-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Robotic technology has been applied to colorectal surgery over the last decade. The aim of this review is to analyze the outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery systematically and to provide objective information to surgeons. METHODS: Studies were searched and identified using PubMed and Google Scholar from Jan 2001 to Feb 2013 with the search terms "robot," "robotic," "colon," "rectum," "colorectal," and "colectomy." Appropriate data in the studies about the outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine publications were included in this review and composed of 39 case series, 29 comparative studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial. Most of the studies reported that robotic surgery showed a longer operation time, less estimated blood loss, shorter length of hospital stay, lower complication and conversion rates, and comparable oncologic outcomes compared to laparoscopic or open surgery. CONCLUSION: Robotic colorectal surgery is a safe and feasible option. Robotic surgery showed comparable short-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. However, the long operation time and high cost are the limitations of robotic surgery.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent816~830-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Loss, Surgical-
dc.subject.MESHColectomy/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHColectomy/methods-
dc.subject.MESHColonic Neoplasms/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHConversion to Open Surgery-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLaparoscopy/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHLaparoscopy/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHLength of Stay-
dc.subject.MESHLymph Node Excision-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm, Residual-
dc.subject.MESHOperative Time-
dc.subject.MESHRectal Neoplasms/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHRobotics*-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleOutcomes of Robotic-Assisted Colorectal Surgery Compared with laparoscopic and Open Surgery: a Systematic Review-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Surgery (외과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang Woo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang Hee Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Hyuk Baik-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11605-014-2469-5-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA01046-
dc.contributor.localIdA01052-
dc.contributor.localIdA01827-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01418-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4626-
dc.identifier.pmid24496745-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11605-014-2469-5-
dc.subject.keywordSystematic review-
dc.subject.keywordRobotic surgery-
dc.subject.keywordda Vinci-
dc.subject.keywordColon cancer-
dc.subject.keywordRectal cancer-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Chang Woo-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Chang Hee-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameBaik, Seung Hyuk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Chang Woo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Chang Hee-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorBaik, Seung Hyuk-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume18-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage816-
dc.citation.endPage830-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, Vol.18(4) : 816-830, 2014-
dc.identifier.rimsid56612-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.