1 640

Cited 8 times in

Comparison of 2 cuff inflation methods of laryngeal mask airway Classic for safe use without cuff manometer in adults.

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김민수-
dc.contributor.author신양식-
dc.contributor.author이정림-
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-06T16:33:09Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-06T16:33:09Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn0735-6757-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/98319-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: This single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, 2-arm, parallel group comparison trial was performed to establish whether the adult-sized laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Classic (The Laryngeal Mask Company Ltd, Henley-on-Thames, UK) could be used safely without any consideration of cuff hyperinflation when a cuff of the LMA Classic was inflated using half the maximum inflation volume or the resting volume before insertion of device. BASIC PROCEDURES: Eighty patients aged 20 to 70 years scheduled for general anesthesia using the LMA Classic were included. Before insertion, the cuff was partially filled with half the maximum inflation volume in the half volume group or the resting volume created by opening the pilot balloon valve to equalize with atmospheric pressure in the resting volume group. Several parameters regarding insertion, intracuff pressure, airway leak pressure, and leakage volume/fraction were collected after LMA insertion. MAJOR FINDINGS: The LMA Classic with a partially inflated cuff was successfully inserted in all enrolled patients. Both groups had the same success rate of 95% at the first insertion attempt. The half volume group had a lower mean intracuff pressure compared with the resting volume group (54.5 ± 16.1 cm H2O vs 61.8 ± 16.1 cm H2O; P = .047). There was no difference in airway leak pressure or leakage volume/fraction between the 2 groups under mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: The partially inflated cuff method using half the maximum recommended inflation volume or the resting volume is feasible with the adult-sized LMA Classic, resulting in a high success rate of insertion and adequate range of intracuff pressures.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent237~242-
dc.relation.isPartOfAMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAnesthesia, General/instrumentation*-
dc.subject.MESHAnesthesia, General/methods-
dc.subject.MESHDouble-Blind Method-
dc.subject.MESHFeasibility Studies-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLaryngeal Masks*-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHManometry/instrumentation*-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHPressure-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.titleComparison of 2 cuff inflation methods of laryngeal mask airway Classic for safe use without cuff manometer in adults.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Anesthesiology (마취통증의학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMin-Soo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong-Rim Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYang-Sik Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi-Won Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyu-Ho Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKi Ryang Ahn-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajem.2013.11.029-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA02123-
dc.contributor.localIdA03098-
dc.contributor.localIdA00463-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00079-
dc.identifier.eissn1532-8171-
dc.identifier.pmid24360025-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675713008097-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Min Soo-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameShin, Yang Sik-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Jeong Rim-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShin, Yang Sik-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Jeong Rim-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Min Soo-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume32-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage237-
dc.citation.endPage242-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Vol.32(3) : 237-242, 2014-
dc.identifier.rimsid51836-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.