1 668

Cited 26 times in

Minimally invasive surgery for serosa-positive gastric cancer (pT4a) in patients with preoperative diagnosis of cancer without serosal invasion

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김유민-
dc.contributor.author노성훈-
dc.contributor.author손태일-
dc.contributor.author이중호-
dc.contributor.author형우진-
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-06T16:30:54Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-06T16:30:54Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn0930-2794-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/98250-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Although surgeons normally use minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for patients with early gastric cancer, in Korea and Japan the procedure is also indicated for serosa-negative tumors. Serosal invasion is regarded to be a potential risk factor for peritoneal dissemination as a result of the effect of pneumoperitoneum and tumor manipulation during the operation. We compared operative outcomes between MIS and conventional open surgery for serosa-involved advanced gastric cancer patients who had a preoperative diagnosis of cancer without serosal invasion. METHODS: A total of 61 patients (39 patients treated by MIS and 22 by open surgery) treated between 2003 and 2009 who were first diagnosed preoperatively as serosa negative on the basis of computed tomography, endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound but then diagnosed as serosa positive upon final pathology were studied. We retrospectively compared recurrence and survival between the two treatment groups. RESULTS: Clinicopathologic characteristics, clinical stage, extent of surgery, and short-term operative outcome did not differ between the groups. 5-year overall survival (73.5 vs. 67.5 %, p = 0.518, respectively) and disease-free survival (67.8 vs. 54.2 %, p = 0.296, respectively) were comparable between the MIS and open surgery groups. There were recurrences in 12 patients in the MIS group and 11 patients in the open surgery group, with a median follow-up period of 64 months. Recurrence patterns did not differ between the groups; moreover, MIS did not increase peritoneal recurrences compared to open surgery (42.0 vs. 54.5 %, p = 0.537, respectively). In multivariate analyses, the type of surgery was not an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Similar survival and recurrence patterns were observed in advanced gastric cancer patients preoperatively diagnosed as serosa negative who were treated either by MIS or open surgery. MIS may be safely applied in patients with serosa-positive tumors.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent866~874-
dc.relation.isPartOfSURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdenocarcinoma/diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHAdenocarcinoma/mortality-
dc.subject.MESHAdenocarcinoma/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHDisease-Free Survival-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subject.MESHGastrectomy/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHJapan/epidemiology-
dc.subject.MESHLaparoscopy-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHMinimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Invasiveness-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHPreoperative Period-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Factors-
dc.subject.MESHSerous Membrane/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHStomach Neoplasms/diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHStomach Neoplasms/mortality-
dc.subject.MESHStomach Neoplasms/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHSurvival Rate/trends-
dc.subject.MESHTomography, X-Ray Computed-
dc.titleMinimally invasive surgery for serosa-positive gastric cancer (pT4a) in patients with preoperative diagnosis of cancer without serosal invasion-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Surgery (외과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorT. Son-
dc.contributor.googleauthorW. J. Hyung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJ. H. Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorY. M. Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorS. H. Noh-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00464-013-3236-5-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00782-
dc.contributor.localIdA01281-
dc.contributor.localIdA01998-
dc.contributor.localIdA03187-
dc.contributor.localIdA04382-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02703-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-2218-
dc.identifier.pmid24149848-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00464-013-3236-5-
dc.subject.keywordMinimally invasive surgery-
dc.subject.keywordAdvanced gastric cancer-
dc.subject.keywordRecurrence-
dc.subject.keywordSerosal invasion-
dc.subject.keywordStomach-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Yoo Min-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameNoh, Sung Hoon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSon, Tae Il-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Joong Ho-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHyung, Woo Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Yoo Min-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorNoh, Sung Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSon, Tae Il-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Joong Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHyung, Woo Jin-
dc.rights.accessRightsfree-
dc.citation.volume28-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage866-
dc.citation.endPage874-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationSURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, Vol.28(3) : 866-874, 2014-
dc.identifier.rimsid51790-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.